CLIL教学法在英语专业阅读教学中的应用研究——以四川工商学院为例被引量：1

The Application of CLIL Teaching Method in Reading Teaching for English Majors—Taking Sichuan Technology and Business University as an Example

下载PDF

导出

摘要 CLIL教学法强调内容与语言的结合,即语言学习与专业学科知识运用的紧密结合,这恰好与培养“一专多能”的英语应用型人才不谋而合。该文选取笔者所在院校英语专业19级两个班为实验对象,探讨将CLIL模式运用于民办高校英语专业阅读教学的效果。实验结果显示:两个班后测成绩的平均值存在显著性差异,表明CLIL教学法促进了实验班学生阅读能力的提升,且对学生的自主学习和学习兴趣也产生了积极影响。 CLIL teaching emphasizes the combination of content and language,that is,the close combination of language learning and the application of professional knowledge,which coincides with the cultivation of versatile English talents who are application-oriented.This study selects two classes of English majors in the author's college as the experimental objects to explore the effect of applying CLIL mode to the reading teaching for English majors in private colleges and universities.The results show that there is a significant difference between the mean of the two classes'post-test scores,indicating that CLIL teaching method facilitates the improvement of students'reading ability in the experimental class,and also it has a positive impact on students'autonomous learning as well as their learning interest.

作者王玲 WANG Ling(School of Foreign Languages,Sichuan Technology and Business University,Meishan Sichuan,620000,China)

机构地区四川工商学院外国语学院

出处《文化创新比较研究》 2021年第9期101-103,113,共4页 Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

基金 2020年四川省民办教育协会科研课题一般项目《CLIL教学法在民办高校英语专业应用型人才培养中的应用研究》的阶段性成果(课题编号:MBXH20YB465)。

关键词 CLIL 民办高校英语专业阅读教学 CLIL Private colleges and universities English majors Reading teaching

分类号 G642 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1米保富.内容与语言融合型教学研究的新进展[J].现代外语,2015,38(5):715-724. 被引量：42
2杨玲,何婧.2010-2019年国内CLIL教学研究的文献分析述评[J].海外英语,2019,0(20):7-8. 被引量：3
3张莲,李东莹.CLIL框架下语言、思辨和学科能力的协同发展[J].外语教育研究前沿,2019,2(2):16-24. 被引量：42
4杨迎华.CLIL教学法的历史背景及其原理[J].安顺学院学报,2016,18(4):61-63. 被引量：6

二级参考文献62

1王美玲.试析内容与语言融合学习在非英语欧盟国家高等教育中的应用[J].山东外语教学,2004,25(2):55-58. 被引量：19
2俞理明,Yeoman,E,韩建侠.双语教育论[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2009:vi,93.
3Arkoudls, 5. 21)05. Fusing pedagogic horizons: Language and content teaching in the mainstream [J]. Linguistics and Education 16(2): 173-187.
4Baecher, L., T. Farnsworth & A. Ediger. 2014. The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction [J]. Language Teaching Research 18(1): 118-136.
5Ball, P. & D. Lindsay. 2010. Teacher training for CLIL in the Basque country: The case of theIkastolas: in search of parameters [A]. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training [C]. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 162-187.
6Barwell, R. 2005. Critical issues for language and content in mainstream classrooms: Introduction [J]. Linguistics and Education 16(2): 143-150.
7Bigelow, M. 2010. Learning to plan for a focus on form in CBI: The role of teacher knowledge and teaching context [A]. In J. Davis (ed.). World Language Teacher Education: Transitions and Challenges in the Twenty-first Century [C]. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 35-56.
8Cammarata, L. & D. J. Tedick. 2012. Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers [J]. The Modern Language Journal 96(3): 251-269.
9Cenoz, J., F. Genesee & D. Gorter. 2013. Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward [J]. Applied Linguistics, Advance Access published July 13: 1-21.
10Coyle, D. 2007. Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies [J]. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5): 543-562.