摘要
目的:在青少年群体中检验中文版时间焦点量表的信度与效度。方法:采用整群取样选取黑龙江省4所中学的1098名青少年,要求其填答中文版时间焦点量表。间隔4周后,在其中抽取127名青少年,要求其填答中文版时间焦点量表、青少年学生生活满意度量表、罗森博格自尊量表和烟酒使用问卷。结果:中文版时间焦点量表12个条目具有良好的区分度。探索性和验证性因素分析结果(χ2/df=4.11,RMSEA=0.08,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,SRMR=0.06)均支持3因子结构。量表的Cronbach’sα系数和重测信度均大于0.7。量表在不同性别群体中具有测量等值性。结论:中文版时间焦点量表在青少年群体中具有良好的信效度,可用于青少年时间焦点的测量以及不同性别之间的比较。
Objective:This study aims to explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese Temporal Focus Scale among adolescents.Methods:A total of 1098 adolescents from 4 middle schools in Heilongjiang Province were tested with the Chinese Temporal Focus Scale.127 adolescents were re-tested after 4 weeks with the Chinese Temporal Focus Scale,the Adolescent Students’Life Satisfaction Scale,the Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale and the Tobacco and Alcohol Use Questionnaire.Results:The 12 items in the Chinese Temporal Focus Scale had good discrimination.Exploratory and con⁃firmatory factor analysis showed that the three-factor model fitted well with the data(χ2/df=4.11,RMSEA=0.08,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,SRMR=0.06).Cronbach’sαindex and retest reliability of 3 dimensions were greater than 0.7.Measurement in⁃variance cross gender was acceptable.Conclusion:The Chinese Temporal Focus Scale has good reliability and validity in adolescents,which can be used a suitable tool to assess the temporal focus and compared across groups of different genders in Chinese adolescents.
作者
朱丽娟
彦廷鹤
刘文
张亚利
王湃
吴迪
安连超
ZHU Li-juan;YAN Ting-he;LIU Wen;ZHANG Ya-li;WANG Pai;WU Di;AN Lian-chao(School of Teacher Education,Suqian University,Suqian 223800,China;College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China;College of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China;Hangzhou Ding He Primary School,Hangzhou 310000,China;Basic Psychological Department of Mudanjiang Medical College,Mudanjiang 157011,China)
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第5期1183-1186,1182,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
宿迁学院人才引进科研启动基金(106-CK0004232)
2022年度江苏省社科应用研究精品工程课题(22SYB-046)资助。
关键词
时间焦点
青少年
信度
效度
Temporal focus
Adolescents
Reliability
Validity