期刊文献+

巴西经营者承诺制度的立法阐释及其对我国的启示

On the New Development of the System of Operators’ Cease and Desist Commitments in Brazilian Antitrust Law and Its Enlightenment to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 巴西经营者承诺制度的独特之处在于将核心卡特尔附条件地鼓励适用;在经营者承诺的程序制度上规定承诺的启动、谈判、裁决和履行及其监督等环节,同时,还规定为保护和救济第三方利益的扩散性权利保护基金的经营者支付规则、第三方介入程序的咨商机制和司法救济制度。我国应借鉴巴西的立法经验,将核心卡特尔附条件地适用于我国经营者承诺制度;完善经营者承诺的程序规则。 It is unique that the core cartel is conditionally encouraged to be applied in the system of cease and desist agreements in Brazilian Antitrust Law. In the procedure system of cease and desist agreements, it is stipulated that the cease and desist agreements are initiated, negotiated, approved and performed and its supervision etc.. At the same time, it also stipulates operators payment rules to the Fund for the Defense of Diffuse Rights, consultation mechanism for third-party intervention procedures and judicial relief system in order to protect and remedy the interests of third parties. China should learn from these legislative experience in Brazilian antitrust law, apply the core cartel conditionally to our country’s operators commitment system, and improve the procedural rules of operators commitment.
作者 山文岑 SHAN Wencen(Law School,Lu Dong University,Yantai 264039,China)
机构地区 鲁东大学法学院
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第5期20-27,共8页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
关键词 经营者承诺制度 反垄断执法 利害关系第三方 巴西 operators commitment system anti-monopoly law interested third parties Brazil
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1施建辉.行政执法中的协商与和解[J].行政法学研究,2006(3):9-15. 被引量:41
  • 2郭雳.美国证券监管执法中的调查与和解制度[M]//杨紫恒.经济法研究:第5卷.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 3Edward H.Cooper.Class Action Advice in the Form of Questions. Duke Journal of Comparative&International Law . 2001
  • 4Prudential Assurance Co.Ltd.v.Newman Industries Ltd.(No.2). Ch257 . 1981
  • 5Elliott J. Weiss,John S. Beckerman.Let The Money Do The Monitoring:How Institutional Investors Can Reduce Agency Cost In Securities Class Action. YALE L. J . 1995
  • 6Benjamin Kaplan.Continuing Work of the Civil Committee:1966Amendments of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure(I). HARV.L.REV . 1967
  • 7S. Stuart Clark.Christina Harris: Multi—Plaintiff Litigation in Australia: a Comparative Perspective. Duke J. Comp. & Int‘l L . 2001
  • 8Sierra Club v.Morton. 405 U.S.727 . 1972
  • 9G.Wiegand.The Reception of American Law in Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law . 1991
  • 10Linda Silberman.Vicissitudes of the American Class Action:With a Comparative Eye. Tul.J.Int‘ 1& Comp.L . 1999

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部