期刊文献+

高中思想政治课教学中问题设计优化研究 被引量:1

Research on the Optimization of Problem Design in High School Ideological and Political Course Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,高中思想政治理论课课程建设取得了一定成绩,但在教学方法改革上仍有一定不足。为进一步培养学生对思政课的学习兴趣,实现内涵式教学,加强在教学环节中对问题设计的关注显得尤为重要。在课堂教学中对问题设计环节的研究有利于实现以学生为本的教育理念,提升思政课的吸引力。本文将问题设计作为高中政治课教学研究对象,对问题设计的内涵进行系统阐释,在充分剖析问题设计在教学中价值导向、情境设计及结构局限性的基础上,为高中思想政治课教学中问题设计提出优化路径。 In recent years, the construction of Ideological and Political Course has made certain achievements in high schools, but there are still some deficiencies in the reform of teaching methods. In order to further cultivate students’ interest in the Ideological and Political Course and realize connotative teaching, it is very important to pay more attention to the problem design in the teaching process.The study of problem design in classroom teaching is conducive to the realization of student-centered education concept, and the promotion of the attraction of the this course.This paper takes problem design as the research object, systematically explains the connotation of problem design, and further proposes an optimization path of problem design for Ideological and Political Course in senior high school on the basis of fully analyzing the value orientation, situation design and structural limitations of problem design in teaching.
作者 顾相君 GU Xiang-jun(Harbin University,Harbin 150086,China)
出处 《当代教研论丛》 2022年第8期39-43,共5页 contemporary Teaching and Research
基金 黑龙江省教育科学规划重点课题:“四史”学习教育与高校思想政治理论课深度融合的具体路径研究(HLJJYGH20220612)。
关键词 问题设计 高中 思想政治课 课堂教学 problem design high school Ideological and Political course classroom teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1程钢.从《教育过程》到《教育文化》——布鲁纳教育文化观述评[J].中国大学教学,2005(5):21-24. 被引量:16
  • 2中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育生物学课程标准(2011版).北京:北京师范大学出版社.2012.
  • 3Tina Blythe. The Teaching for Understanding Guide. San Fra-ncisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998: xi-xv,1-7.
  • 4IOWA Department of Education. Characteristics of EffectiveInstruction [EB/OL]. 2012. http://educateiowa.gov/index.php.option=com_content&view=article&id=2102#tu. [2013-05-16].
  • 5Ron Brandt. On Teaching for Understanding: A Conversationwith Howard Gardner. Educational Leadership, 1993,4:4-7.
  • 6Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Private UniverseProject in Science, Workshop 2 Biology: Why Are Some IdeasSo Difficult. [EB/OL]. 1995. http://www.learner.org/resourc-es/series29.html.pop=yes&pid=84#. [2013-05-15].
  • 7Active Learning Practice for Schools (ALPS). Teaching forUnderstanding: What is Understanding. A Deeper Look [EB/OL]. http://leamweb.harvard.edu/alps/tfu/infolb.cfm. 2013,5:15.
  • 8David Perkins, Tina Blythe. Putting Understanding Up Front.Educational Leadership, 1994,2: 4-7.
  • 9John Wallace, William Louden. What We Don’t Understandabout Teaching for Understanding: Questions from ScienceEducation .Journal of Curriculum Studies,2003,35(5):545-566.
  • 10National Research Council. Next Generation Science Standard-s. April, 2013.

共引文献3892

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部