期刊文献+

颈椎前路单节段减压融合与减压融合联合钢板内固定对相邻节段生物力学效应的有限元分析 被引量:1

Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of anterior cervical single-segment decompression fusion and decompression fusion combined with internal fixation on adjacent segments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较颈椎前路单节段减压融合与减压融合联合钢板内固定对相邻节段生物力学的效应。方法根据1例正常成人的颈椎CT构建C3-C7有限元模型,验证模型有效性。在此模型基础上,分别以C4/5或C5/6为融合部位,构建颈前路单纯减压融合与减压融合联合钢板的术后模型。以无损模型和术后模型作为研究对象,约束C7椎体的下表面,于C3椎体的上表面施加73.6 N的轴向力和1 N·m的力矩,比较融合部位相邻节段的活动度以及纤维环和髓核应力的差异。结果与C4/5单纯融合模型相比,C4/5联合钢板模型上级节段活动度和应力均增大,其中活动度最大增幅为5.44%,纤维环与髓核应力的最大增幅为8.10%;而下级节段活动度和应力降低,其中活动度最大降幅为17.29%,纤维环与髓核应力的最大降幅分别为21.96%和15.67%。与C5/6单纯融合模型相比,C5/6联合钢板模型上级节段活动度和应力主要表现为增长,其中活动度最大增幅为4.64%,纤维环和髓核的最大应力增幅分别为7.16%和6.84%;而下级节段C6/7活动度和应力主要表现为降低,其中活动度最大降幅为7.85%,纤维环和髓核应力的最大降幅分别为12.52%和6.74%。结论相比于单纯融合模型,联合钢板模型上级水平的活动度和应力增加,而下级水平的活动度和应力降低。联合钢板可能会促进融合部位上级水平椎间盘的退变,减缓下级水平因融合造成的应力增加。 【Objective】To compare the effects of anterior cervical single-segment decompression fusion and decompression fusion combined with plate internal fixation on the biomechanics of adjacent segments.【Methods】A C3-C7 finite element model was constructed based on the CT of a normal adult cervical spine to verify the validity of the model.Then,based on this model,postoperative models of anterior cervical simple decompression fusion and decompression fusion combined with plates were constructed with C4/5 or C5/6 as the fusion sites,respectively.Then,the nondestructive model and the postoperative model were used as the study objects to constrain the lower surface of the C7 vertebral body and apply an axial force of 73.6 N and a moment of 1 N·M on the upper surface of the C 3 vertebral body to compare the rang of motion of the adjacent segments at the fusion site and the differences in the stresses on the annular fibrous and the nucleus pulposus.【Results】Compared with the C4/5 simple fusion model,both range of motion and stress increased in the superior segment of the combined C4/5 plate model,with a maximum increase in range of motion of 5.44%and a maximum increase in annular fibrous and nucleus pulposus stress of 8.10%;whereas range of motion and stress decreased in the inferior segment,with a maximum decrease in range of motion of 17.29%and a maximum decrease in annular fibrous and nucleus pulposus stress of 21.96%and 15.67%,respectively.Compared with the C5/6 simple fusion model,the range of motion and stress in the superior segment of the C5/6 combined plate model mainly showed an increase,with the maximum increase in range of motion of 4.64%and the maximum increase in stress in the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus of 7.16%and 6.84%,respectively;while the range of motion and stress in the inferior segment of C 6/7 mainly showed a decrease,with the maximum decrease in range of motion of 7.85%and the maximum decrease in stress in the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus of 12.52%and 6.74%,respectively.【Conclusion】Compared with the simple fusion model,the combined plate model showed increased range of motion and stress at the superior level and decreased range of motion and stress at the inferior level.The combined plate may promote disc degeneration at the superior level of the fusion site.
作者 李宝强 于泽 徐志浩 董乐乐 LI Baoqiang;YU Ze;XU Zhihao;DONG Lele(Baotou Medical College of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Graduate School,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014040,China;Orthopedics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou,Inner Mongolia,014010,China)
出处 《中国医学工程》 2022年第10期5-17,共13页 China Medical Engineering
关键词 减压融合术 相邻节段病变 钢板 有限元分析 decompression fusion adjacent segment pathology plate finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1HELLER J G, SASSO R C, PAPADOPOULOS S M, et al. Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial [J]. Spine, 2009, 34(2): 101-107.
  • 2PHILLIPS F M, ALLEN T R, REGAN J J, et al. Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adja- cent level fusion surgery: a prospective study [J]. Spine, 2009, 34(6): 556-565.
  • 3MATSUNAGA S, KABAYAMA S, YAMAMOTO T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decom- pression and fusion[J]. Spine, 1999, 24(7): 670-675.
  • 4MUMMANENI P V, HAID R W. The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004, 1(2): 155-159.
  • 5ELSAWAF A, MASTRONARDI L, ROPERTO R, et al. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2009, 32(2): 215-224; discussion 224.
  • 6MATGE G, EIF M, HERDMANN J, et al. Dynamic cervical implant (DCITM): clinical results from an international multi- center prospective study [J]. Paradigm Spine, 2009, 1: 1-3.
  • 7ZHU Ruofu, YANG Huilin, WANG Zhidong, et al. Com- parisons of three anterior cervical surgeries in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014, 15(1): 233.
  • 8MO Zhongjun, ZHAO Yanbin, WANG Lizhen, et al. Biome- chanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of sur-rounding soft tissue [J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(3): 613-621.
  • 9PANJABI M M, WHITE A A 3rd, JOHNSON R M. Cervi- cal spine mechanics as a function of transection of components [J]. J Biomech, 1975, 8(6); 327-336.
  • 10TEO E C, NG H W. Evaluation of the role of ligaments, fac- ets and disk nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using finite element method [J]. Med EngPhys, 2001, 23(3): 155-164.

共引文献27

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部