摘要
悬泉汉简ⅡT0214①∶130和ⅤT1611③∶39所载道路里程与路线可以进行比较与演算。简ⅡT0214①∶130所载酒泉郡最东端一置不是表是,而在表是以西;表是县在当时属张掖郡。简ⅤT1611③∶39所载的武威郡治不在姑臧,而可能在番和。简ⅤT1611③∶39所示“东南”驿道,干道经天水通安定,基本上即传统认识的长安至河西的“北道”,并有支路通金城。基于以上结论,大致可以复原出简ⅡT0214①∶130的完整面貌。两简共同反映出西汉某一时期河西的部分驿道与政区情况。
It is possible to make a comparative calculation of the distances and routes recorded inⅡT0214①∶130 andⅤT1611③∶39,two Han dynasty slips from Xuanquan.The post at the easternmost point of Jiuquan Prefecture recorded inⅡT0214①∶130 was not Biaoshi,but to the west of it;Biaoshi was a county belonged to Zhangye Prefecture at that time.The jurisdiction of Wuwei Prefecture recorded inⅤT1611③∶39 was not in Guzang,but possibly in Fanhe.The main line of the“Southeast”courier route as seen inⅤT1611③∶39 passed Tianshui and connected Anding,which was basically the conventionally acknowledged“North Route”from Chang an to Hexi.This route also had a branch to Jincheng.Based on the above conclusions,the features ofⅡT0214①∶130 can be roughly reconstructed.The two slips ofⅡT0214①∶130 andⅤT1611③∶39 commonly display a portion of the courier routes and administrative divisions of Hexi at a certain point in the Western Han dynasty.
作者
黄学超
Huang Xuechao(Center for Historical Geographical Studies,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处
《历史地理研究》
CSSCI
2022年第3期42-53,153,共13页
The Chinese Historical Geography
关键词
悬泉汉简
里程简
河西
驿道
政区
Han Dynasty Slips from Xuanquan
slips on the distances
Hexi
courier routes
administrative divisions