期刊文献+

交流学习者认知风格对双方语言准确性的影响

The Influence of Cognitive Style of Communication Learners on the Accuracy of Both Languages
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究设立三种认知风格,通过交流学习任务和个人迁移任务,比较探查交流学习者认知风格对双方语言准确性的影响。结果显示:①交流中场独立性交流者语言认知加工水平更低,且各认知风格条件下语言准确性均呈不规则的倒U型分布,场独立性认知风格最高值出现最早。②高、低相似组语言准确性差异在交流后期表现出来,且仅出现在场独立性和场依存性认知风格中;交流双方交流认知存在差异性。③交流语言准确性上场独立性显著低于场依存性,而交流认知准确性上无显著差异;交流者交流认知水平高于语言认知水平。研究发现:①场独立性交流者语言认知水平相对更低,但对非语言线索的利用效率最高;②交流语言认知随交流进程呈倒U型分布,交流语言认知不代表交流认知的全部;③交流双方语言认知和交流认知存在差异。 The study set up three cognitive styles,and explored the influence of cognitive style of communication learners on the accuracy of both languages by communication learning task and individual transfer task.The results showed that.①The field independent communicators had lower level of language cognitive processing,and the language accuracy of each cognitive style was irregular inverted U distribution,and the highest value of field independent cognitive style appeared earliest.②The difference of language accuracy between high and low similarity groups was demonstrated at the later stage of communication and appeared only in the two cognitive styles of field independence and field dependence.The communicative cognitions of the two sides were different.③In the respect of the communicative language accuracy,field independence was significantly lower than field dependence,and there was no significant difference in the communicative cognition accuracy.The level of communicative cognition was higher than that of language cognition.The results suggested that①The field independent communicators had a lower level of language cognition,but the use of nonverbal cues was the most efficient;②The language cognition of communication with the communication process was inverted U distribution and communication language cognition did not represent the whole communication cognition.③There were differences between language cognition and communication cognition of the both communicators.
作者 张恒超 ZHANG Hengchao(School of Psychology,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)
出处 《河南科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第10期1-10,共10页 Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“交流社会认知”(18FSH014),主持人:张恒超 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“交流手势认知研究”(20JHQ091),主持人:张恒超。
关键词 认知风格 交流 语言 cognitive style communication language
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献123

  • 1沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 2Araban, S. , Zainalipour, H. , Saadi, R. H. R., Javdan, M. , Sezide, K. , & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of cooperative learning effects on self-efficacy and academic achievement in English lesson of high school students. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (9), 8524 - 8526.
  • 3Arnold, ]. E. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , Altmann, R. J. , & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578 -582.
  • 4Bangerter, A. , & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27 (2) , 195 - 225.
  • 5Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391 -418.
  • 6Bezuidenhout, A. (2012). Perspective taking in conversation: A defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics, in press.
  • 7B6gels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., & Chwilla, D. J. (2011). Pitch accents in context: How listeners process accentuation in referential communication. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2022 -2036.
  • 8Branigan, H. P., Pit'kering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13 -B25.
  • 9Brenuan, S. E. , Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A. , Neider, M. B. , & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognitior, 106 (3), 1465 - 1477.
  • 10Brennan, S. E. , & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274 -291.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部