摘要
本文认为,没有任何证据可以证明龚鼎孳的词集《白门柳》即余怀所说的传奇《白门柳》,龚鼎孳完全具有创作传奇剧本《白门柳》的可能性;词集《白门柳》不能称之为联章叙事之作,因之认为龚鼎孳词集《白门柳》具有“以词为传奇”的特色也是不能成立的。这一以事件线索聚合词作的形式,更接近于词与小说、戏曲等俗文学体式丛生的时代原貌,由此更能窥见清词中兴的原点所在。
There is no evidence to prove that Willow at White Gate,a collection of ci poetry by Gong Dingzi,and Willow at White Gate,a legendary story by Yu Huai,are the same book.Gong Dingzi was undoubtedly capable of writing Willow at White Gate,a legendary story.The ci poetry collection of Willow at White Gate cannot be labeled as a serial narrative poems,and it is unreliable to maintain that the works has the characteristics of the legend in the form of ci poetry.This takes the form of aggregating poems by the event clues,closer to the original features of ci poems,novels,plays,and other popular literary styles.Hence to find out the starting point of rejuvenation of ci poetry in the mid-Qing Dynasty from it.
出处
《文学与文化》
2022年第3期57-64,共8页
Literature and Culture Studies
关键词
龚鼎孳
《白门柳》
传奇
清词中兴
Gong Dingzi
Willow at White Gate
Legend
Resurgence of Ci Poetry in the mid-Qing Dynasty