期刊文献+

基于模糊认知诊断模型的慕课学习成效评估 被引量:1

Evaluation of MOOC Learning Effectiveness Based on Fuzzy Cognitive Diagnostic Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对慕课高辍学率和低完成率、缺乏有效的质量评价标准及指标体系、学习效果难以保证等问题,引入心理测量领域的认知诊断模型Fuzzy-CDF,提出了知识水平层级的学生学习成效评估方法,对章节的阶段性诊断来反馈学生知识弱项、推荐资源,采用过程数据来训练模型,完成形成性评价。通过采集爱课程“信号与系统”的教育大数据进行实验分析表明:该方法可行有效,灵活且好理解,具有实际应用参考价值。 In response to the high dropout rate and low completion rate of MOOC, the lack of effective quality evaluation standards and indicator systems, and the difficulty of guaranteeing learning effects, the cognitive diagnosis model Fuzzy-CDF in the field of psychometrics is introduced, and a method for evaluating the learning effectiveness of students at a level of knowledge is proposed. Periodic diagnosis of chapters is used to feedback students′ knowledge weaknesses and recommended resources, and process data is used to train the model to complete formative evaluation. The experimental analysis by collecting the educational big data of the course Signal and System shows that the method is feasible, effective, flexible and easy to understand, and has practical application reference value.
作者 王炼红 帅智康 许加柱 罗志辉 WANG Lianhong;SHUAI Zhikang;XU Jiazhu;LUO Zhihui(College of Electrical and Information Engineering,Hunan University,Changsha 410012,China)
出处 《电气电子教学学报》 2022年第5期108-113,共6页 Journal of Electrical and Electronic Education
基金 中国高校产学研创新基金重点项目(2019ITA01016) 中国高等教育学会数字化课程资源研究专项(21SZYB15)。
关键词 学习成效评估 慕课 模糊认知诊断 evaluation of learning effectiveness MOOC fuzzy cognitive diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1Hartz, S., Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (2002). A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities :Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation ,University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign.
  • 2Henson, R. & Douglas, J.(2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(4), 262-277.
  • 3Junker, B. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement. 25(3), 258-272.
  • 4Leighton, J. E , Gierl, M., & Hunka, S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach. Journal of educational measurement, 41(3), 205-236.
  • 5Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education : Theory and Applications. Cambridge (pp.242-274), UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187-212.
  • 7Rupp, A. A., & Templin, J. (2008). The effects of Q-Matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68(1), 78-96.
  • 8Samejima, F. (1995). Acceleration model in the heterogeneous case of the general graded response model. Psychomatrika, 60, 549-572.
  • 9Samejima, F. (1997). Graded Response Model. Van der Linden W. J. & Hambleton R.K.(Eds.). Handbook of modern item response theory (pp.85-100). Springer-New York press.
  • 10Tatsuoka, K. K. (1995). Architecture of knowledge structure and cognitive diagnosis: a statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment (pp. 327-361). Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.

共引文献1751

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部