期刊文献+

学术界的“灰姑娘”:国际教学学术的发展困境和变革图景 被引量:1

Cinderella in Scholarship:The Dilemma and Future of International Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Development
原文传递
导出
摘要 教学学术是推进大学教学与学术变革的重要工具。但国际教学学术的理论发展和实践推进遇到了种种障碍,包括教学学术的价值遭遇认知误解、资源投入有限,以及参与群体出现分化、教学学术成为弱势群体的生存之道。之所以出现这些困境,可从教学学术的理论本体、大学组织文化、教学学术的功用绩效三个方面窥见原因,即教学学术的理论共识性不强、遭遇高等教育正统原则的抵制,以及教学学术的学术资本价值相对偏低。为走出困境,国际教学学术将开展三个领域的变革,即不断扩展教学学术的理论边界并接纳多种概念和方法,不断加强教学学术的组织化建设,将教学学术理念嵌入教师发展制度中。 The international community has encountered various obstacles in the scholarship of teaching and learning theoretical development and practical promotion,including the misunderstood value of scholarship of teaching and learning,limited resource input,the differentiated participant groups,and the habitat of the vulnerable groups.The reasons why the scholarship of teaching and learning encounters these difficulties are the low consensus,the resisting from the orthodox principle of higher education,and the low academic value.In order to solve the dilemma,the theoretical boundary of scholarship of teaching and learning will be expanded,the organization construction will be strengthened,and the idea of scholarship of teaching and learning will be integrated into the faculty development system.
作者 朱炎军 ZHU Yan-jun(Department of Development Planning,Shanghai University of International Business&Economics,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期94-100,共7页 Journal of Higher Education
关键词 教学学术 教师发展 发展困境 未来图景 scholarship of teaching and learning teacher development development dilemma future prospect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献42

  • 1陈永明.英国大学教师聘任制的现状与特征[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2006,7(4):14-19. 被引量:13
  • 2Ernest L.Boyer.Scholarship Reconsidered:Priorities for the Professoriate[R].CarnegieFoundation for the Advancement of Teaching,Princeton,NJ,1990:24.
  • 3Pat Hutchings,Lee Shulman.The Scholarship of Teaching:New Elaborations,New Devel-opments[J].Change,1999,31(5):10-15.
  • 4Lee Shulman.From Minsk to Pinsk:why a scholarship of teaching and learning[J].Jour-nal of Scholarship in Teaching and Learning,2000,1(1),48-53.
  • 5Maxine Atkinson.The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning:Reconceptualizing Scholarshipand Transforming the Academy[J].Social Forces,2001.79(4):1217-1229.
  • 6Connie Schroeder.Countering SoTL marginalization:A model for integrating SoTL with In-stitutional Initiatives[J].International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,2007.1(1):1-9.
  • 7Carolin Kreber,Patricia Cranton.Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching[J].The Journal ofHigher Education,2000,71(4):476-495.
  • 8Carolin Kreber.Controversy and consensus on the Scholarship of Teaching[J].Studies inHigher Education,2002,27(2):151-167.
  • 9Roger Boshier.Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Such a Hard Sell[J].Higher Education Research&Development,2009,28(1):1-15.
  • 10奥尔特加·加塞特.大学的使命[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.67-69、70-71、50-51.

共引文献62

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部