期刊文献+

诊断试验准确性比较研究系统评价的证据分级 被引量:1

GRADE approach in systematic reviews of comparative diagnostic accuracy study
原文传递
导出
摘要 诊断试验准确性比较(CDTA)研究是诊断准确性试验的一种,旨在同一诊断试验研究中比较2个及以上诊断试验的准确性。CDTA系统评价的GRADE证据确信度分级与单个诊断试验准确性系统评价不同,主要体现在研究设计的选择、偏倚风险的评估及试验准确性比较指标的使用等方面。本文重点介绍GRADE分级方法应用于CDTA系统评价的基本原理和方法,以促进国内学者对该方法的理解与应用。 Comparative diagnostic test accuracy study, a type of diagnostic accuracy test, aims to compare accuracy of two or more index tests in a study. The application of GRADE in comparative test accuracy differs from single test accuracy, mainly including the selection of appropriate comparative study designs, additional criteria for judging risk of bias, and the consequences of using comparative measures of test accuracy. The study focuses on basic principles and methods of GRADE approach in systematic reviews of comparative test accuracy to promote the understanding and application of the method by domestic scholars.
作者 陆瑶 杨秋玉 赖鸿皓 田晨 陈耀龙 田金徽 李霓 李江 葛龙 LU Yao;YANG Qiuyu;LAI Honghao;TIAN Chen;CHEN Yaolong;TIAN Jinhui;LI Ni;LI Jiang;GE Long(Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Department of Social Science and Health Management,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Evidence Based Nursing Centre,School of Nursing,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Evidence-based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;National Cancer Center/National Cancer Clinical Medical Research Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第10期1233-1240,共8页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 北京市科技新星计划项目(编号:Z201100006820070) 甘肃省科技计划项目(编号:20CX4ZA027、20CX9ZA112)。
关键词 诊断试验准确性比较研究 GRADE 证据分级 系统评价 Comparative diagnostic test accuracy study GRADE Grading evidence Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献80

  • 1李强.如何正确开展临床诊断性研究——诊断试验研究设计的基本原则[J].中国全科医学,2006,9(2):170-171. 被引量:5
  • 2黄一宁,高山,王莉鹃,汪波.闭塞性脑血管病经颅多谱勒超声和脑血管造影的比较[J].中华神经科杂志,1997,30(2):98-101. 被引量:176
  • 3Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
  • 4Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779.
  • 5Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
  • 6Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 924-926.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336: 995-998.
  • 9Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336:1049-1051.
  • 10Schunemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek l, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336:1106-1110.

共引文献466

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部