基于文献计量分析穴位埋线临床近十年研究现状

An analysis of clinical research status of acupoint embedding in recent 10 years based on bibliometrics

目的:梳理近十年国内外穴位埋线临床研究,探究该领域的研究现状和发展水平,总结规律,为穴位埋线研究提供参考。方法:计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed数据库中收录的近十年(2010-2020年)穴位埋线临床研究文献,并分类进行计量分析。结果:①年发文量:共纳入1196篇期刊论文,其中中文文献1181篇,英文文献15篇,年发文量总体呈波动上升的趋势。②作者发文量及发文地区:纳入文献由998名研究人员撰写,发文量居前5位的作者发文均不超过10篇,核心作者仅占总发文人数的3.91%;发文地区以广东省、广西壮族自治区、河南省、浙江省为主。③发文期刊:《上海针灸杂志》的发文量最多(97篇),其次是《中国针灸》(61篇);发文量居前20位的期刊中仅有2种北大中文核心期刊,科技核心期刊有8种,普刊有10种。④基金资助:有522篇文献(43.65%)获得基金资助,基金类别以省市级为主(69.42%),国家级基金资助仅占10.64%。⑤样本量:文献的样本量以51~100例为主(69.06%),样本量频次居前3位依次为:60例(244篇)、80例(85篇)、90例(76篇)。⑥治疗病种:病种多样,治疗频次较多的疾病依次是肥胖症137次(11.45%)、中风相关疾病68次(5.69%)、多囊卵巢综合征59次(4.93%)。⑦不良反应:195篇(16.30%)文献明确记录了埋线后的不良反应,均未见严重不良反应。结论:穴位埋线临床研究前景广阔,日益受到重视。但现有临床研究水平和层次较低,未来需要更多高质量、大样本、多中心的临床研究。

Objective:To analyze the characteristics of clinical research on acupoint embedding in the past ten years at home and abroad,to explore the research status,development and regulars of this field so as to provide references for research related to acupoint embedding.Methods:The literature on clinical research of acupoint embedding in recent ten years(from 2010 to 2020)were searched in the databases of CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,and PubMed,and were classified for a measurement analysis.Results:(1)A total of 1196 articles were included.There were 15 English papers and 1181 Chinese papers.These papers showed a fluctuating increasing trend in recent ten years.(2)Authors’publication volume and region:The included literature was written by 998 researchers.The top 5 authors published no more than 10 articles,and the core authors only accounted for 3.91%of the total number of articles published;publication areas were mainly Guangdong Province,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Henan Province and Zhejiang Province.(3)Published journals:Shanghai Journal of acupuncture and moxibustion had the largest number of articles(97),followed by Chinese acupuncture and moxibustion(61);Among the top 20 journals,there were only 2 Peking University Chinese core journals,the rest were 8 science and technology core journals and 10 general journals.(4)Fund support:522 articles(43.65%)were supported by funds.The main types of funds were provincial and municipal(69.42%),and the national funds only accounted for 10.64%.(5)Sample size:The sample size of the literature was mainly 51 to 100 cases(69.06%).The top three sample sizes were as follow:60 cases(244 articles),80 cases(85 articles),and 90 cases(76 articles).(6)Treatment diseases:There were many types of diseases.The diseases with more frequent treatment were obesity of 137 times(11.45%),stroke related diseases of 68 times(5.69%)and polycystic ovary syndrome of 59 times(4.93%).(7)Adverse reactions:195 articles(16.30%)clearly recorded adverse reactions after acupoint embedding,and no serious adverse reactions were found.Conclusion:Clinical research of acupoint embedding has broad prospects and attracted more and more attention.However,the current level and gradation of clinical research are low.More high-quality,large sample and multi center clinical research will be needed in the future.