期刊文献+

不同口径引流管促进微孔胸腔镜术后快速康复的效果研究 被引量:4

Effect of drainage tubes with different diameters in promoting quick recovery after microporous thoracoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同口径引流管对微孔胸腔镜术后康复及切口愈合的影响。方法回顾性分析89例行微孔胸腔镜手术患者的临床资料,分别应用8F、16F、24F引流管。比较术后切口愈合情况及引流情况。结果16F组和8F组术后切口愈合不良率为0%,24F组术后切口愈合不良率为13.3%;16F组与24F组术后引流情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);16F组严重皮下气肿或气胸的发生率为0%,低于8F组的13.8%;相较于24F组外接胸瓶,16F组外接负压球可以更早下床活动。结论微孔胸腔镜术后使用16F引流管的效果更好。优化置管技术及缝合技巧有利于切口愈合,实现术后快速康复。 Objective To investigate the effect of drainage tubes with different diameters on rehabilitation and wound healing after microporous thoracoscopy.Methods Clinical materials of 89 patients with microporous thoracoscopy were retrospectively analyzed,and 8 F,16 F and 24 F drainage tubes were used respectively.The wound healing condition and drainage condition after operation were compared.Results The poor healing rate of incision after operation was 0%in group 16 F and group 8 F,while was 13.3%in group 24 F;there was no significant difference in postoperative drainage condition between group 16 F and group 24 F(P>0.05);the incidence of severe subcutaneous emphysema or pneumothorax in group 16 F was 0%,which was lower than 13.8%in group 8 F;compared to patients with the external chest bottle in group 24 F,the patients with external negative pressure ball in group 16 F were able to complete bed-off activity earlier.Conclusion Efficacy of 16 F drainage tube is much better in patients after microporous thoracoscopy.Optimizing the tube placement technology and suture skills are beneficial to wound healing and rapid postoperative recovery.
作者 管仲 镇海文 章斌 GUAN Zhong;ZHEN Haiwen;ZHANG Bin(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210029)
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2022年第18期124-125,130,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 微孔胸腔镜手术 引流管 置管技术 缝合技巧 快速康复 microporous thoracoscopy drainage tube tube placement technology suture skills rapid recovery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1Gonzalez-Rivas D, Delgado M, Fieira E, et al. Left lower sleeve lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg0 2014, 18(2): 237-239.
  • 2Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, de la Torre M, et al. Bronchovascular right upper lobe reconstruction by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis, 2014, 6(6): 861-863.
  • 3Gonzalez-Rivas D, Delgado M, Fieira E, et al. Double sleeve uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 3(2): E2.
  • 4Gonzalez-Rivas D, Mendez L, Delgado M, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy. J "Ihorac Dis, 2013, 5 (Suppl 3): $226-$233.
  • 5Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann ~Ihorac Surg, 2004, 77(2): 726-728.
  • 6Gonzalez D, Paradela M, Garcia J, et al. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011, 12(3): 514-515.
  • 7Gonzalez-Rivas D, Yang Y, Guido W, et al. Non-intubated (tubeless) uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 5(2): 151-153.
  • 8Delgado Roel M, Fieira Costa EM, Gonz~lez-Rivas D, et al. Uniportal video- assisted thoracoscopic lymph node dissection. J Thorac Dis, 2014, 6(Suppl 6): $665-$668.
  • 9Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Terzi A~ et al. Geometric and ergonomic characteristics of the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach. Ann Cardiothorac Surg~ 2016, 5(2): 118-122.
  • 10Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J q~orac Dis, 2013, 5(Suppl 3): $234-$245.

共引文献162

同被引文献75

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部