期刊文献+

社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Social Cues on Explicit and Implicit Metacognitive Monitoring and Control
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究以词图匹配材料为学习材料,以“大多数人选择的情况”为社会性线索,通过分析行为表现和眼动指标,探讨了社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响。结果显示:(1)第一次信心判断时,外显信心判断显著高估,内隐信心判断较为准确。第二次信心判断时,在线索一致条件下,外显信心判断等级显著高于内隐信心判断。(2)在提供社会性线索阶段和第二次再认阶段,与线索一致条件相比,线索不一致条件下被提示项的注视时间更短,而未提示项的注视时间更长,且个体改变选择的次数显著增多。结果表明:内隐和外显元认知监测存在分离,内隐监测的准确性更高,外显监测受社会性线索的影响更大;而内隐和外显的元认知控制受社会性线索的影响趋同。 This study examined the impact of social cues on explicit and implicit metacognition by analyzing behavior performance and eye movement measurements. The results showed that, in the first judgment, participants significantly overestimated the explicit confidence judgment whereas the implicit confidence judgment was more accurate. In the second judgment, when cues were consistent, explicit confidence judgments were significantly higher than those that were implicit. In the stage of providing social cues and the second recognition stage, compared with the cue-consistent condition, the fixation time of the cued item was shorter under the cue-inconsistent condition, while the fixation time of the uncued item was longer. In conclusion, the accuracy of implicit monitoring is higher than explicit monitoring which is more influenced by social cues, while implicit and explicit metacognitive control are similarly influenced by social cues.
作者 贾宁 容丽卓 代景华 JIA Ning;RONG Lizhuo;DAI Jinghua(College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024;School of Economics and Management,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401;Hebei University of Chinese Medicine,Shijiazhuang 050200)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期593-599,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(ZD202109)。
关键词 社会性线索 外显元认知 内隐元认知 眼动 social cues explicit metacognition implicit metacognition eye movement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1李晓明,傅小兰.情绪性权衡困难下的决策行为[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):801-808. 被引量:14
  • 2牛勇.(2006).权衡困难情境下的学习时间分配决策中国科学院博士学位论文.
  • 3Ariel, R.,Dunlosky, J.,& Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda - based regu-lation of study - time allocation : When agendas override item - basedmonitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 138, 432-447.
  • 4Dunlosky, J.,& Ariel, R. (2011a). Self - regulated learning and theallocation of study time. In B. H. Ross (Ed. ) , The Psychology ofLearning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory ( Vol.54,pp. 103 - 140). San Diego: Academic.
  • 5Dunlosky, I.,& Ariel, R. (2011b). The influence of agenda - basedand h^ibitual processes on item selection during study. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,and Cognition, 37, 899-912.
  • 6Dunlosky, J. , Ariel,R.,& Thiede, K. W. (2011). Agenda - basedregulation of study - time allocation. In P. A. Higham & J. Leboe(Eds. ) , Constructions of Remembering and Metacognition : Essays inHonoir of Bruce Whitdesea (pp. 182 - 198). Basingstoke : PalgraveMacmillan.
  • 7Dunlosky, J.,& Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improvelearning in later adulthood : Helping older adults educate themselves.
  • 8In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds. ),Meta-cognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 249 - 275). Mah-wah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 9Metcalfe,J. (2002 ). Is study time allocated selectively to a region ofproximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131,349 -362.
  • 10Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Cur-rent Directions in Psychological Science, 181 159 - 163.

共引文献14

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部