期刊文献+

PBL结合CBL教学法在外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用 被引量:10

PBL Combined With CBL Teaching Method in Surgical Residents Training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较以问题为导向的教学法(problem-based learning,PBL)和以案例为导向的教学法(case-based learning,CBL)相结合的教学法与传统教学法(lecture-based learning,LBL)在外科住院医师规范化培训(简称“住培”)中的效果差异。方法2021年8月—2021年12月在5个英文数据库(PubMed、Embase、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane)和3个中文数据库(中国知网、万方、维普数据库)中检索有关PBL/CBL教学法对比LBL教学法在外科住培中应用效果的研究,末次检索时间为截至2021年8月23日。结果指标包括基础理论成绩、实践操作成绩、病例分析成绩和教学满意度。结果Meta分析共纳入12项随机对照试验,涵盖611名外科住院医师,其中PBL/CBL教学组306名,LBL教学组305名。结果显示PBL/CBL教学组的基础理论成绩、实践操作成绩、病例分析成绩均高于LBL教学组,PBL/CBL教学组教学满意度高于LBL教学组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论PBL/CBL教学法在外科住培中的教学效果优于LBL教学法。 Objective To assess the effect of problem-based learning(PBL)combined with case-based learning(CBL)for surgical residents training compared with lecture-based learning(LBL).Methods The study was conducted from August 2021 to December 2021.Five English databases(PubMed,Embase,Medline,Web of Science and Cochrane)and three Chinese databases(CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases)were searched.Studies comparing PBL/CBL and LBL for surgical residents training were included.The final search was conducted at August 23,2021.The outcome included basic theory score,clinical skill score,case analysis score,and teaching satisfaction.Results Meta analysis included 12 randomized controlled trials covering 611 surgical residents,including 306 in PBL/CBL teaching group and 305 in LBL teaching group.The results showed that the scores of basic theory,practical operation and case analysis in the PBL/CBL teaching group were higher than those in the LBL teaching group,and the teaching satisfaction in the PBL/CBL teaching group was higher than that in the LBL teaching group,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion PBL/CBL teaching method is better than LBL teaching method in surgical residents training.
作者 吴清彬 黄军 候秋菊 何亚舟 王自强 WU Qingbin;HUANG Jun;HOU Qiuju;HE Yazhou;WANG Ziqiang(Colorectal Cancer Center,Department of General Surgery,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610041,China;West China School of Medicine,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610041,China;West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University,ChengduSichuan 610041,China;Department of Oncology,West China Fourth Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610044,China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2022年第18期31-36,共6页 China Continuing Medical Education
基金 四川省科技计划项目(2021YFS0025)。
关键词 PBL教学法 CBL教学法 LBL教学法 住院医师规范化培训 教学效果 系统评价 problem-based learning case-based learning lecture-based learning standardized training for residents teaching effectiveness meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献240

  • 1陈旭春,李怀鹏,张毅杰.对规范化培训住院医师进行教师培训必要性的调查与分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2020(1):18-19. 被引量:1
  • 2陈丽芬,王亚军,李大蓉,贾明艳.住院医师出科考核的组织与实施及思维导图[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2021,5(1):36-39. 被引量:6
  • 3刘利,李芳,凌云,张明琼,李敏.住院医师规范化培训教师教学绩效激励的实践与探索[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2020,4(4):325-328. 被引量:13
  • 4凌保东.中美高等医学教育比较及思考[J].中国高等医学教育,2007(7):33-35. 被引量:24
  • 5Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2009.264-269.
  • 6Moher D,Cook D J,Eastwood S. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement[J].The Lancet,1999.1896-1900.
  • 7Group M. Meta-Analysis of Observational studies in Epidemiology.A proposal for reporting[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2000.2008-2012.
  • 8Sacks HS,Berrier J,Reitman D. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1987.450-455.
  • 9Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J].European Journal of Epidemiology,2010.603-605.
  • 10Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J].Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery,2003.712-716.

共引文献836

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部