中美大学生跨洋互动写作回评类型对比研究

A Contrastive Study of Sino-US College Students'Back-review Types in Cross-Pacific Exchange Writing

写作同伴互动是作者与同伴之间进行的多向的、动态的协作过程。相较于同伴反馈得到的广泛关注,作者对同伴反馈的回评却未受到重视。本文结合在线讨论、反思日志和后续访谈,对比跨洋互动写作中的中美作者回评类型的异同并探究其原因。数据分析显示:(1)中美回评类型具有一致性,都包括接受性反馈、模糊性反馈和不接受性反馈三种类型,其中模糊性反馈的数量居多;(2)中美回评遵循“接受性反馈→模糊性反馈”的模式;(3)中美回评子类的出现频次存在显著性差异。定性分析表明,中美回评受中美教育理念、中美同伴反馈类型以及本族语者和非本族语者的写作目的等因素影响。

Peer interaction in writing is a multidirectional and dynamic collaborative process between writers and their peers.Compared with the extensive research on peer feedback,few studies have examined how authors give back reviews to peer feedback.Based on the data from online discussions,reflective journals and follow-up interviews,this paper contrasted the commonalities and differences of Sino-US college students'back-review types and explored the factors that meditated their back reviews in Cross-Pacific Exchange Writing.The statistical analysis revealed that:(1)the types of Sino-US back reviews were consistent,which included acceptable feedback,fuzzy feedback,and non-acceptable feedback,and the number of fuzzy feedbacks was the largest;(2)Sino-US back reviews both followed the pattern of“acceptable feedback→fuzzy feedback”;(3)the frequencies of their subcategories showed significant differences.The qualitative analysis showed that Sino-US back reviews were mediated by the ideologies of Sino-US education,the types of Sino-US peer feedback,and the writing purposes of native and non-native speakers.