期刊文献+

感性崛起与歧义共同体

The Uprise of Aesthetics and the Politics of Ambiguity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于康德哲学,人的心灵领域存在着三种基本判断形式:逻辑判断、道德判断和感性判断。其中,理性分为纯粹理性和实践理性,主要用于逻辑判断和道德判断,感性在愉悦判断中占据主导位置,主要用于艺术、审美和趣味判断。基于阿伦特哲学,判断的普遍有效性在于自由。自由有两个层面:一是自由的社会结构,由理性、对话和协商的自由主体建构;二是自由的社会内容是公民的自由意识,由可交流的感性共同体建构。判断普遍有效性在于感性传播过程的可交流性,政治学应基于感性体验和感性交流,这催生了自由政治学新向度——歧义政治学,用于思考政治哲学中感性判断的歧义和多元。 Based on Kant’s philosophy,the mind of human beings contains three kinds of judgement:logic judgement,moral judgement and aesthetic judgement.Ration is divided into pure ration and practical ration,which produces logic judgement and moral judgement.Aesthetics plays an important role in joy which forms art and taste judgement.Based on Ardent’s philosophy,freedom is the foundation of judgement.There are two kinds of freedom:the first is the freedom of social structure which comes from the subject of ration,dialogue and negotiation;and the second is the freedom of social content which comes from aesthetic communication.The judgement should be founded on the communicability on the process of communication.Politics should consider the experience and communication of aesthetic,which is the new direction of freedom politics—ambiguity politics,which can be used to consider ambiguity and pluralism of aesthetic judgement in political philosophy.
作者 陈中雨 Chen Zhongyu(School of Journalism and Communication,Northwest University,Xi’an,China)
出处 《社会科学论坛》 2022年第6期81-92,共12页 Tribune of Social Sciences
关键词 康德 阿伦特 感性判断 自由政治学 歧义政治学 Kant Ardent aesthetic judgement freedom politics ambiguity politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部