期刊文献+

多媒体学习中的元理解监测线索

The cues of learners’metacomprehension monitoring during multimedia learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于学习者进行元理解监测究竟是使用启发式线索还是表征线索,尚存在一定的争议。本文通过操作不同呈现方式设计三个实验对学习者元理解监测使用的线索进行探究,结果发现多媒体呈现方式下,学习者的元理解监测会受到多媒体优势信念的影响,比单独学习文本的学习者做出更高的元理解判断;使用预先警告可以降低多媒体优势信念对元理解监测的影响,使学习者做出更为准确的元理解判断;相对于单独学习文本的学习者,采用多媒体呈现方式时学习者会获得更多的元理解监测表征线索。研究结果启示学习者在进行多媒体学习时应时刻警示,且教育者需在教育材料中进行相应的标识。 There were most controversy for the cues of metacomprehension monitoring.This study explored the cues of learners’metacomprehension monitoring by using three experiments.The results found that the multimedia superiority beliefs impact learner’s metacomprehension monitoring during multimedia learning.Compared to the learners who accepted text-only presentations,the learners who accepted the multimedia presentations made higher metacomprehnsion judgment.Giving warning before could help the learner make metacomprehension judgment more effectively during multimedia learning.Compared to the learners who accepted text-only presentations,learners could get more metacomprehension monitoring characterization cues during multimedia learning.The result was meaningful for learners and teachers.If the learners used multimedia presentation,they should realize that the multimedia belief may mislead themself,and the teachers should label the key points in the teaching contents.
作者 韩婷婷 喻丰 陈琼 赵俊峰 HAN Tingting;YU Feng;CHEN Qiong;ZHAO Junfeng(Hubei University of Economics,Wuhan 430205;Department of Psychology,School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079;Institute of Psychology and Behavior,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004)
出处 《心理研究》 CSSCI 2022年第5期470-480,共11页 Psychological Research
基金 湖北经济学院教研项目(B2020015)。
关键词 元理解监测 元理解判断 多媒体呈现方式 多媒体优势信念 metacomprehension monitoring metacomprehension judgment multimedia presentation multimedia superiority belief
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献81

  • 1Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psvchologica, 128, 110- 118.
  • 2Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
  • 3Hacker, D. J. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-192). Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 4Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
  • 6Kornell. N., & Bjork. R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219-224.
  • 7Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391.
  • 8Maki, R. H., & McGuire, M. J. (2002). Metacognition for text: Findings and implications for education. In T. J. Perfect, & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 39-67). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A., E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723-731.
  • 10Matlin, NI. W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部