期刊文献+

4D-HyCoSy和HSG检查对输卵管性不孕的诊断分析 被引量:2

Diagnostic Analysis of 4D-HyCoSy and HSG Examination in Tubal Infertility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文探讨在输卵管性不孕中的诊断中,经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影(4D-HyCoSy)和X线下子宫输卵管造影(HSG)的差异。选取92例疑似输卵管性不孕患者,给予4D-HyCoSy、HSG和腹腔镜通染液实验(LSC)检查,同时在4D-HyCoSy检查时进行宫腔压力测量。以LSC检查为金标准,4D-HyCoSy检查与LSC检查Kappa值为0.810,P<0.05;HSG检查与LSC检查Kappa值为0.905,P<0.05;4D-HyCoSy、HSG对输卵管状况的诊断准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);输卵管梗阻患者4D-HyCoSy、HSG检查时宫腔压力峰值明显高于通而不畅和通畅患者(P<0.05)。在诊断输卵管性不孕中,4D-HyCoSy和HSG对于输卵管通畅性均有较高的诊断价值。 This paper discussed the differences between four-dimensional hyterosalpingo-contrast-sonography(4D-HyCoSy)and hysterosalpingography(HSG)under X-ray in the diagnosis of tubal infertility.92 patients with suspected tubal infertility were selected,they were examined by 4D-HyCoSy,HSG and laparoscopic staining solution experiment(LSC),and the uterine pressure was measured during the 4D-HyCoSy examination.LSC examination was taken as the gold standard,and the Kappa value of 4D-HyCoSy and LSC was 0.810(P<0.05).The Kappa value of HSG and LSC was 0.905(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of 4D-HyCosy and HSG for tubal status(P>0.05).The peak values of intrauterine pressure in patients with tubal obstruction during 4D-HyCoSy and HSG were significantly higher than those in patients with partially obstructed and unobstructed(P<0.05).In the diagnosis of tubal infertility,4D-HyCoSy and HSG have high diagnostic value in the judgement of tubal patency.
作者 王慕喆 李向红 邢秀月 王丽娜 周叶 李晓丽 WANG Muzhe;LI Xianghong;XING Xiuyue;WANG Lina;ZHOU Ye;LI Xiaoli(Department of Gynecology,QionghaiPeople’s Hospital,Qionghai 571400,Hainan,P.R.China;Department of Ultrasound,Qionghai People’s Hospital,Qionghai 571400,Hainan,P.R.China)
出处 《影像科学与光化学》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第6期1370-1374,共5页 Imaging Science and Photochemistry
关键词 经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影 子宫输卵管造影 输卵管性不孕 transvaginal four-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound of uterus and fallopian tube hysterosalpingography tubal infertility
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献150

  • 1孙旸,徐烨,韩晨光,白晟遥(综述),陈晓(审校).宫腹腔镜和机器人治疗输卵管性不孕手术应用进展[J].武警医学,2020(3):247-251. 被引量:3
  • 2王蕾,段金良.子宫内膜容受性的评估及改善方法[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(8):556-557. 被引量:2
  • 3程琦,王文娜,王莎莎,朱贤胜,王泓,凌茵,贺冬莲.经阴道子宫输卵管三维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的应用研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(19):6086-6088. 被引量:35
  • 4Danielle E. Luciano,Caterina Exacoustos,D. Alan Johns,Anthony A. Luciano.Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2011(1)
  • 5Rhiana D. Saunders,James M. Shwayder,Steven T. Nakajima.Current methods of tubal patency assessment[J].Fertility and Sterility.2011(7)
  • 6Hossam O. Hamed,Ahmed Y. Shahin,Aly M. Elsamman.Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency[J].International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2009(3)
  • 7Caterina Exacoustos,Errico Zupi,Claudia Carusotti,Giulio Lanzi,Daniela Marconi,Domenico Arduini.Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography Compared with Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopic Dye Pertubation to Evaluate Tubal Patency[J].American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.2003(3)
  • 8Kawwass JF,Crawford S,Kissin DM,et al. Tubal factor infertilityand perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology[J]. ObstetGynecol,2013,121(6): 1263-1271.
  • 9Abrao MS,Muzii L,Marana R. Anatomical causes of femaleinfertility and their management [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013,123(Suppl 2):S18-S24.
  • 10Practice Committee of American Society for ReproductiveMedicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committeeopinion[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012,98 C 2) : 302-307.

共引文献240

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部