摘要
逻辑例外论的主要观点是:逻辑是其他各门科学(包括自然科学、社会科学和人文科学)的例外,因为逻辑命题对于这个世界无所说,因其所含逻辑常项的意义而为真或为假;逻辑真理是分析的、必然的和先验的,因而是不可修正的;逻辑规律对于如何正确思维具有规范性。逻辑例外论的代表性人物至少有莱布尼茨、休谟、康德、弗雷格、维特根斯坦和艾耶尔,本文简要讨论了他们的观点及其论证,并指出了其潜在的理论困难。
The main viewpoints of logical exceptionalism are that logic is exceptional with respect to all other sciences,including natural science,social science and humanities,because logical propositions say nothing about the world,and are true or false based on the meanings of logical constants?that logical truth is analytical,a prior and necessary,so it is not revisal?and that logical laws are normative for how to think correctly.This article takes Leibniz,Hume,Kant,Frege,Wittgenstein and Ayer as the representative figures of logical exceptionalism,outlines their viewpoints and arguments about logic,and exposes the internal difficulties of their positions.
作者
陈波
Bo Chen(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University)
出处
《逻辑学研究》
CSSCI
2022年第5期38-50,共13页
Studies in Logic
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代逻辑哲学重大前沿问题研究”(17ZDA024)。
