期刊文献+

乌司他丁联合加巴喷丁及芬太尼对神经病理性疼痛患者的镇痛效果及炎症因子的影响 被引量:5

Effects of ulinastatin combined with gabapentin and fentanyl on analgesic effect and inflammatory factor level in patients with neuropathic pain.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乌司他丁联合加巴喷丁及芬太尼治疗神经病理性疼痛(NP)的镇痛效果及对患者炎症因子水平的影响。方法选择中国人民解放军空军军医大学第二附属医院2019年1月至2021年1月收治的200例NP患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为对照组和观察组,每组100例。对照组患者给予加巴喷丁及芬太尼治疗,观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上联合乌司他丁治疗,1周为一个疗程,共治疗4周。比较两组患者治疗前后的疼痛数字评分(NRS)、炎症因子[前列腺素E2(PEG2)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)]水平及生活质量量表(QOL)变化,并统计两组患者治疗期间的不良反应发生情况。结果治疗后,两组患者的NRS评分均降低,且观察组为(2.21±0.26)分,明显低于对照组的(3.38±0.47)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者的PGE2、IL-1β、IL-6水平均降低,且观察组患者的上述各项指标分别为(34.14±4.23)μg/mL、(7.91±1.23)pg/mL、(8.21±1.34)pg/mL,明显低于对照组的(78.91±5.99)μg/mL、(11.39±2.21)pg/mL、(13.41±2.67)pg/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者的睡眠、食欲、日常生活、精神状态评分均降低,且观察组患者的上述各项评分分别为(2.31±0.30)分、(2.19±0.21)分、(2.10±0.31)分、(2.51±0.19)分,明显低于对照组的(3.89±0.28)分、(3.98±0.40)分、(3.74±0.51)分、(3.92±0.17)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组患者的不良反应发生率分别为8.00%、11.00%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论乌司他丁联合巴喷丁及芬太尼治疗NP可有效抑制炎症因子释放,缓解疼痛,改善生活质量,安全性较高,可在临床中推广应用。 Objective To investigate the analgesic effect of ulinastatin combined with gabapentin and fentanyl in the treatment of neuropathic pain(NP)and its effect on the level of inflammatory factors.Methods A total of 200 patients with NP treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University of PLA from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group according to random number table,with 100 patients in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with gabapentin and fentanyl,and the patients in the observation group were treated with ulinastatin on the basis of the treatment in the control group,with one week as a course of treatment,for a total of 4 weeks.The Pain Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)for Pain Intensity,inflammatory factors levels[prostaglandin E2(PEG2),interleukin-6(IL-6),and interleukin-1β(IL-1β)],and quality of life(QOL)scale changes were compared between the two groups before and after treatment,and the adverse reactions of the two groups during treatment were counted.Results After treatment,the NRS score of the two groups decreased,and the score of the observation group was(2.21±0.26)points,which was significantly lower than(3.38±0.47)points of the control group;the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,PGE2,IL-1β,and IL-6 levels in the two groups significantly decreased,and the above indexes in the observation group were(34.14±4.23)μg/mL,(7.91±1.23)pg/mL,and(8.21±1.34)pg/mL,which were significantly lower than(78.91±5.99)μg/mL,(11.39±2.21)pg/mL,and(13.41±2.67)pg/mL in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).After treatment,the scores of sleep,appetite,daily life,and mental state of patients in the two groups decreased,and the above scores of patients in the observation group were(2.31±0.30)points,(2.19±0.21)points,(2.10±0.31)points,and(2.51±0.19)points,which were significantly lower than(3.89±0.28)points,(3.98±0.40)points,(3.7±0.51)points,and(3.92±0.17)points in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group and the control group were 8.00%and 11.00%,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Ulinastatin combined with gabapentin and fentanyl in the treatment of NP can effectively inhibit the release of inflammatory factors,relieve pain,and improve the quality of life,which has high safety and can be popularized and applied in clinic.
作者 屈丽虹 雷世雄 闫辉 张芳芳 QU Li-hong;LEI Shi-xiong;YAN Hui;ZHANG Fang-fang(Department of Anesthesiology,Department of Pain,Xi'an 710038,Shaanxi,CHINA;Department of Anesthesiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University of PLA,Xi'an 710038,Shaanxi,CHINA)
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2022年第21期2741-2744,共4页 Hainan Medical Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81801391)。
关键词 神经病理性疼痛 乌司他丁 加巴喷丁 芬太尼 镇痛效果 炎症因子 生活质量 不良反应 Neuropathic pain Ulinastatin Gabapentin Fentanyl Analgesic effect Inflammatory factors Quality of life Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献64

  • 1Merskey H. The taxonomy of pain. Med Clin North Am,2007,91 : 13-20, vii.
  • 2乾辛二,杮木隆介.痛みの腦內機構.腦と神經,2006,58:5-15.
  • 3牛田享宏,池本龍澤,篠崎淳,他.痛みの腦機能イメ-ジンケ研究.ペンクリニツク,2006,27:1528-1536.
  • 4Serra J. Overview of neuropathic pain syndromes. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl,1999, 173:7-11.
  • 5Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl, 1986,3:S1-S226.
  • 6Dworkin RH. An overview of neuropathic pain: syndromes, symptoms, signs, and several mechanisms. Clin J Pain, 2002, 18:343-349.
  • 7Sindrup SH, Otto M, Finnerup NB, et al. Antidepressants in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2005,96 : 399 -409.
  • 8Rowbotham MC, Harden N, Stacey B, et al. Gabapentin for the treatment postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 1998,280:1837-1842.
  • 9Gorson KC, Schott C, Herman R, et al. Gabapemin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: a placebo controlled, double blind, crossover trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1999,66:251-252.
  • 10Gimbel JS, Richards P, Portenoy RK. Controlled-release oxyco- done for pain in diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 2003,60:927-934.

共引文献140

同被引文献56

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部