期刊文献+

沉船沉物设标费用债权性质分析及保障机制研究 被引量:1

Analysis of the Nature of Creditor’s Rights and Study on the Supporting Mechanism on the Layout Cost of Ato Ns for Wreck
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合国内外公约和法律法规,对沉船沉物设标费用法律债权进行分析,梳理相关典型司法案例,提出设标费用对于沉船沉物所有人来说属于非限制性债权,设标义务人无权援引海事赔偿责任限制,但基于船舶碰撞损害责任纠纷等法律关系向加害船追偿时,被请求人依法有权援引《海商法》第207条的规定限制其责任。在设标费用保障机制方面,结合工作实际,提出开展沉船沉物设标费用标准核算工作,设标前与沉船沉物所有人、经营人或者管理人签署协议或获得委托、完善作业记录并妥善保存,及时要求设标义务人确认费用和索赔等建议。 Based on domestic legislation and international conventions, this paper analyzes the legal creditor’s right for the cost of setting up aids to navigation(Ato N) for shipwrecks, and studies relevant typical judicial cases. It proposes that the Ato N setting fee should be an unrestricted creditor’s right for the owner of the wrecks and the obligators setting the Ato N has no right to invoke the limitation of liability for maritime claims. However, when claiming recovering against the guilty ship based on legal relations of ship collision damage liability disputes, the respondent has the right to limit its liability by invoking the provisions of Article 207 of the Maritime Law. In terms of the guarantee mechanism for the Ato N setting fee and in view of the actual work, the paper suggests conducting standard accounting of the bid setting fees for the wreck, signing agreements or obtaining entrustment with the owners, operators or managers of the wreck before setting Ato N, improving operation records and keeping it properly, and promptly requesting the bidder to confirm the fees and claims, etc.
作者 张鹏 王绍明 范海涛 ZHANG Peng;WANG Shao-ming;FAN Hai-tao(Ards to Navigation Department of Shanghai of Eastern Navigation Service Center,Shanghai 201208,China;Shanghai Branch of Zhonglun W&D Law Firm,Shanghai 200135,China)
出处 《中国海事》 2022年第11期51-55,共5页 China Maritime Safety
关键词 沉船沉物 设标费用 债权性质 海事赔偿责任限制 费用保障机制 wreck cost of AtoN setting nature of creditor’s rights limitation of liability for maritime claims guarantee mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1虞正平.《股东有限责任--现代公司法律之基石》,法律出版社2001年版,第22页.
  • 2[英]巴里·尼古拉斯.《罗马法概论》,黄风译,法律出版社2004年第2版,第237-239页.
  • 3世界著名法典汉译丛书编委会.《十二铜表法》,法律出版社2000年版,第36,55页.
  • 4周枏.《罗马法原论(下)》,商务出版社1996年版,第805-810页.
  • 5James J. Donovan. The origins and development of limitation of shipowners' liability, Tulane Law Review, 1978 - 1979, (53) : 999 - 1045, pp. 1001 - 1002.
  • 6George B. Fraser. Action in rein. Cornell Law Quarterly, 1948 - 1949, (34) :29 -62, p. 30.
  • 7Matthew P. Harrington. Rethinking In Rem: The Supreme Court's new (and misguided) approach to civil forfeiture. Yale Law & Policy Review, 1994, (12) :281 - 354, p. 281.
  • 8Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1923. pp. 11 -12.
  • 9许美玲.《船舶所有人责任限制制度之历史发展与国际统一法化之研究》[J].[台]东吴大学法律学报,1997,(1):11-11.
  • 10林群弼.《由海商法第二十一条论船舶所有人之责任限制》[J].[台]中正大学法学集刊,2001,:68-68.

共引文献10

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部