期刊文献+

产前超声表现与胎儿染色体异常的关系分析

Analysis of the Relationship Between Prenatal Ultrasound Findings and Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨产前超声表现与胎儿染色体异常的关系,并根据超声检查结果为合理实施侵袭性产前诊断技术提供依据。方法回顾性分析进行羊水细胞染色体检查的7908例孕妇的产前超声表现,其中292例羊水细胞染色体检查异常,了解其超声征象与染色体疾病类型的关系。结果292例羊水细胞染色体检查异常患者中,同时存在产前超声异常82例(28.08%),其中超声软指标异常59例(20.21%),结构畸形12例(4.11%),合并指征11例(3.77%)。结论超声检查的软指标和结构异常可为羊水染色体检查提供有力证据,提高产前侵入性诊断的准确性,减少和避免漏诊。 Objective To investigate the correlation between prenatal ultrasound findings and fetal chromosomal abnormalities,and to provide a basis for rational implementation of invasive prenatal diagnosis based on ultrasound findings.Methods The prenatal ultrasound findings of 7908 pregnant women who underwent chromosome examination of amniotic fluid cells were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,292 cases had abnormal chromosome examination of amniotic fluid cells.Results Among 292 cases with abnormal chromosome examination of amniotic fluid cells,82 cases(28.08%)had abnormal prenatal ultrasound,including 59 cases(20.21%)with abnormal soft indicators,12 cases(4.11%)with structural malformations,and 11 cases(3.77%)with combined indications.Conclusion The soft index and structural abnormality of ultrasonography can provide strong evidence for chromosome examination of amniotic fluid,improve the accuracy of prenatal invasive diagnosis,reduce and avoid missed diagnosis.
作者 刘明艳 徐贵江 李茜 周凯 胡苏玮 Liu Mingyan;Xu Guijiang;Li Qian;Zhou Kai;Hu Suwei(Yangzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Yangzhou University Medical College Hospital,Medical Genetics Center,Yangzhou 225001,China)
出处 《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》 2022年第13期4-7,共4页 Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
关键词 羊膜腔穿刺术 染色体核型 超声检查 Amniocentesis Chromosome karyotype Ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献71

  • 1杨文娟,吴青青,姚苓,王莉,李蔓,王欣,李莉.产前超声筛查胎儿心脏异常表现与染色体异常的相关性研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(4):765-771. 被引量:24
  • 2张月萍,徐建忠,殷民,陈美芳,任德麟.染色体平衡易位携带者妊娠风险及妊娠结局的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(9):592-596. 被引量:36
  • 3常才,戴晴,谢晓艳,译.妇产科超声学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.647.
  • 4李胜利.胎儿畸形产前诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004,595.
  • 5Brady PD, Vermeesch JR. Genomic microarrays: a technology overview[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:336-343.
  • 6Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2010,86: 749-764.
  • 7Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013,41:610-620.
  • 8Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomie hybridization for prental diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32: 976-985.
  • 9Shaffer LG, Dosenfeld JA, Dabell MP, et al. Detection rates of clinically significant genomie alterations by mieroarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:986-995.
  • 10Wapner R J, Marthin CL, Lery B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prental diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367:2175-2184.

共引文献323

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部