期刊文献+

三种生存质量量表在老年骨创伤术后患者中的适用性研究

Applicability of three quality of life scales in elderly patients after bone trauma surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较SF-36量表(the MOS 36-item short form health survey,SF-36量表)、SF-12量表(12-item short form survey,SF-12量表)以及欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire,EQ-5D)在老年骨创伤术后患者生存质量中的评估结果差异。方法本研究为横断面研究,运用SF-36量表、SF-12量表以及EQ-5D分别对2020年5月—2021年5月入住四川省成都市某三级甲等医院创伤医学中心的157例老年骨创伤患者进行生存质量调查评估。结果本组157例骨创伤患者,女性96例(61.1%),男性61例(38.9%);年龄65~97岁,平均75.0岁;仅一处骨折133例(84.7%),两处及以上骨折24例(15.3%);仅上肢骨折35例(22.3%),上下肢均存在骨折122例(77.7%)。SF-36量表、SF-12量表以及EQ-5D的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.877、0.701、0.393,折半信度分别为0.862/0.864、0.738/0.321、0.374/0.551,说明SF-36量表具有良好的内部一致性;结构效度以抽样适合性检验值表示,分别为0.762、0.697、0.612,说明SF-36量表和SF-12量表展示了良好的结构效度;同时效度比较SF-36量表得分(91.9±17.2)分、SF-12量表得分(30.8±6.6)分,计算得出r=0.911,P<0.05,说明SF-36量表与SF-12量表呈现高度的相关性。结论在评估老年骨创伤患者生存质量时,SF-36量表拥有更高的信效度,具有极高的内部一致性,建议相关研究者首选SF-36量表。 To compare the results of quality of life(QoL)of elderly patients following bone trauma surgery,assessed respectively by the MOS 36-item short form survey(SF-36)scale,SF-12 scale and EuroQoL five dimensions questionnaire(EQ-5D).Methods This is a cross-sectional study.The SF-36 scale,SF-12 scale and EQ-5D scale were used to evaluate the QoL of 157 elderly patients with bone trauma,who had surgery in the trauma center of a tertiary hospital in Chengdu,Sichuan Province from May 2020 to May 2021.Results Among the 157 patients,there were 96 females(61.1%)and 61 males(38.9%),aged 65-97 years,mean 75.0 years.Single fractures occupied 84.7%(133 cases)and two or multiple fractures 15.3%(24 cases);35 cases(22.3%)only affected the upper limb and 122 cases(77.7%)affected both the upper and lower limbs.The Cronbacha’sαof SF-36,SF-12 and EQ-5D was 0.877,0.701 and 0.393;while the split-half reliability was 0.862/0.864,0.738/0.321,0.374/0.551,respectively,indicating a good internal consistency of the SF-36.The structure validity,expressed as Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values,was 0.762,0.697,and 0.612,respectively,revealing better results of SF-36 and SF-12.The concurrent validity ratio of SF-36 scored 91.9±17.2,and SF-12 scored 30.8±6.6,showing a high correlation between the two scales(r=0.911,P<0.05).Conclusion When assessing the QoL of elderly patients following bone trauma surgery,the SF-36 scale has a higher reliability and validity,and extremely high internal consistency,compared with SF-12 and EQ-5D.It is recommended to be the first choice for related researchers.
作者 郑琪翔 徐小凤 陈咏梅 蒋婷 魏思莹 敬荷雅 Zheng Qixiang;Xu Xiaofeng;Chen Yongmei;Jiang Ting;Wei Siying;Jing Heya(West China School of Nursing/The Trauma Center Ward 2 of West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;West China School of Nursing/Department of Vascular Surgery,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;West China School of Nursing,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《创伤外科杂志》 2022年第11期854-857,共4页 Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基金 四川大学华西护理学科发展专项基金(HXHL20037)。
关键词 骨科创伤 生存质量 SF-36量表 SF-12量表 欧洲五维健康量表 老年 Bone trauma Quality of life SF-36 SF-12 EQ-5D Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1侯金泓,徐应军,刘俊江.SF36-Ⅱ在血液透析患者中信度、效度、敏感度的评价[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(14):2646-2648. 被引量:19
  • 2Roth T,Kammerlander C,Gosch M,et al.Outcome in geriatric fracture patients and how it can be improved[J].Osteoporos Int,2010,21; S615-619.
  • 3EuroQol Group.EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life[J].Health Policy,1990,16:199- 208.
  • 4Tsuchiya A,Ikeda S,Ikegami N,et al.Estimating an EQ-5D population value set:the case of Japan[J].Health Econ,2002,11:341-353.
  • 5Kontodimopoulos N,Pappa E,Angelos A,et al.Comparing SF-6D and EQ-5D utilities across groups differing in health status[J].Qual Life Res,2009,18:87-97.
  • 6Ghatnekar O,Eriksson M,Glader EL.Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to EQ-5D weights[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2013,11:34.
  • 7Mulhem B,Meadows K.The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D,SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2014,12:42.
  • 8Coretti S,Ruggeri M,McNamee P.The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index:a critical review[J].Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res,2014,14:221-233.
  • 9Parsons N,Griffin XL,Achten J,et al.Outcome assessment after hip fracture:is EQ-5D the answer?[J].Bone Joint Res,2014,3:69-75.
  • 10Roche JJ,Wenn RT,Sahota O,et al.Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people:prospective observational cohort study[J].BMJ,2005,331:1374.

共引文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部