期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠不同治疗方法的效果对比

Comparison of different treatment methods of uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对不同治疗方式对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者的疗效进行对比分析。方法 选取宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者56例,将其按抽签法分为研究组(腹腔镜病灶清除术)和对照组(清宫术联合子宫动脉栓塞术),各28例,比较两组各项指标。结果 两组手术、住院及疼痛缓解时间进行比较,观察组短于对照组;两组术中出血量进行比较,观察组少于对照组;与术前3 d比较,术后7~14 d两组血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)水平均呈降低趋势,且研究组均低于对照组,同时研究组血清β-HCG恢复正常的时间短于对照组;研究组术后14 d内并发症总发生率为7.14%,低于对照组的28.57%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者应用腹腔镜病灶清除术可调节血清β-HCG水平,缩短术后恢复时间,且安全性高。 Objective To compare and analyze the effects of different treatment methods on patients with uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section. Methods 56 cases of uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section were selected and divided into study group(laparoscopic focus removal) and control group(curettage combined with uterine artery embolization), with 28 cases in each group. The indicators of two groups were compared. Results The operation, hospitalization and pain relief time of the two groups were compared, the observation group was shorter than the control group;the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was less than that in the control group;compared with 3 days before operation, the serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin(β-HCG) levels in the two groups showed a decreasing trend from 7 to 14 days after the operation, and the study group was lower than the control group;at the same time, the time for serum β-HCG return to normal in the study group was shorter than that in the control group;the total incidence of complications in the two groups within 14 days after operation was compared,7.14% in the study group was lower than 28.57% in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic debridement of uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section can regulate serum β-HCG level, shorten postoperative recovery time, and is safe.
作者 张慧芳 张大明 Zhang Huifang;Zhang Darning(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,HohhotHuimin District Hospital,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010030,China)
出处 《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》 2021年第27期28-30,共3页 Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
关键词 剖宫产 子宫瘢痕妊娠 子宫动脉栓塞术 腹腔镜病灶清除术 并发症 Cesarean section Uterine scar pregnancy Uterine artery embolization Laparoscopic debridement Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献135

  • 1刘桂莹.子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治进展[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(21):660-661. 被引量:1
  • 2张晓燕,王红静,贾西彪,杨琴,郄明蓉,王雪.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处妊娠103例临床分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2010,41(4):745-747. 被引量:21
  • 3金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 4胡营营,唐颖,王莉芬,吕丽,苏本利,王乃玉,冯晓海.HOXA11在人子宫内膜和早孕蜕膜中的表达及与不育的关系[J].生殖医学杂志,2007,16(2):86-90. 被引量:6
  • 5Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review ofmanagement options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2013,25(6):456-461. DOI: 10.1097/GC0.0000000000000023.
  • 6Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Caesarean scarpregnancy: issues in management[J]. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol, 2004, 23(3):247-253.
  • 7Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(8):537-543.
  • 8Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000,16(6):592-593.
  • 9Liu S,Sun J, Cai B, et al. Management of Cesarean ScarPregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016,23(5):707-711. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012.
  • 10Wang M, Yang Z, Li Y,et al. Conservative management ofcesarean scar pregnancies: a prospective randomizedcontrolled trial at a single center[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(10):18972-18980.

共引文献831

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部