期刊文献+

回应性监管理念下共享自习室治安风险防控研究 被引量:1

Research on Public Security Risk Prevention and Control of Shared Self-study Room Under the Concept of Responsive Supervision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 共享自习室是近年来共享经济发展出的新业态,它在便捷人们生活的同时,也衍生出许多潜在的治安风险。回应性监管理念所强调的政府与非政府机构协同监管模式,能够有效弥补政府对新兴领域的干预不足,回应性监管理念下共享自习室治安风险防控的基本措施,主要涉及政府及其相关职能部门的监管、共享自习室行业自我监管、行业协会的介入以及加强各主体间的互动协调等措施。 Shared self-study room is a new form of business developed in the sharing economy in recent years.It facilitates people s lives,while it also generates many potential public security risks.The responsive supervision concept emphasizes the coordinated supervision model of government and non-government institutions,which can effectively compensate for the lack of government intervention in emerging fields.The basic measures for the prevention and control of public security risks in the shared self-study room under the responsive supervision concept mainly involve the government and its related functional departments,such as the supervision of the industry,the self-regulation of the shared self-study room industry,the intervention of industry associations,and the strengthening of interaction and coordination among various subjects.
作者 陈羽言 严彬野 CHEN Yuyan;YAN Binye(People s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《北京城市学院学报》 2022年第5期76-81,共6页 Journal of Beijing City University
基金 北京市法学会委托项目“贯彻总体国家安全观,依法维护首都安全研究”(20170154)。
关键词 回应性监管 共享自习室 治安风险 responsive supervision shared self-study room public security risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1彭菲.探析当代大学生消费结构与消费行为[J].现代营销(信息版),2020,0(2):225-225. 被引量:4
  • 2刘柳.破解网络餐饮领域治理难题[J].东方法学,2019,0(5):140-146. 被引量:7
  • 3苏力.福柯的刑罚史研究及对法学的贡献[J].比较法研究,1993,7(2):173-186. 被引量:35
  • 4强世功.国家主权与公民伦理[J].读书,2007(1):95-103. 被引量:12
  • 5Philip Selznick. Regulatory Policy and the Social Science. Berkely. University of California Press, 1985.
  • 6Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge. The Oxford Hand Book of Regulation. New York. Ox- ford University Press, 2010.
  • 7Julia Black. "Decentring Regulation. Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a 'Post- Regulatory' World". Current Legal Problems, 2001 (54).
  • 8Matthew D. Alder, and Eric A. Posner. Cost-benefit Analysis . Legal, Economic and Philosophical Perspec- tives. Chicago & Illinois. University of Chicago Press, 2001.
  • 9Roger Sherman. The Regulation of Monopoly. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 10Stephen Breyer. Regulation and Its Reform. Cambridge. Harvard University Press, 1982.

共引文献80

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部