期刊文献+

基于灰色聚类法的装配式建筑环境评价 被引量:1

Environmental Assessment of Prefabricated Buildings Based on Grey Clustering Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对装配式建筑环境因素进行分析,建立基于灰色聚类综合评价模型。首先,搜集装配式建筑生命周期内的环境评价指标,应用COWA算子确定环境评价指标权重;然后,结合灰色聚类评价分析模型,确定装配式建筑环境评价等级;最后,结合案例对建立的评价模型进行验证。研究表明,该模型对装配式建筑的环境评价是可行的。基于此对评价结果进行分析,提出装配式建筑发展建议。 The environmental factor of prefabricated buildings was studied, and a comprehensive evaluation model based on gray clustering was established. First of all, the environmental evaluation indicators in the life cycle of the prefabricated building were collected, with the COWA operator used to determine the weight of the environmental evaluation indicators;then the gray cluster evaluation analysis model was adopted to determine the environmental evaluation level of the prefabricated building;and finally, the established evaluation model was verified with the case, which proves that the model is feasible for environmental evaluation of prefabricated buildings,and gives suggestions for the analysis of evaluation results.
作者 徐福强 陈龙 Xu Fuqiang;Chen Long
出处 《重庆建筑》 2022年第11期62-66,共5页 Chongqing Architecture
关键词 装配式建筑 灰色聚类 综合评价 环境评价 prefabricated building grey clustering comprehensive evaluation environmental assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1黄宏伟,边亦海.深基坑工程施工中的风险管理[J].地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(4):611-614. 被引量:125
  • 2徐泽水.拓展的C-OWA算子及其在不确定多属性决策中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(11):7-13. 被引量:91
  • 3边亦海,黄宏伟,李剑.可信性方法在深基坑施工期风险分析中的应用[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(1):70-73. 被引量:43
  • 4肖上平,李义连.隧道环境噪声调查与评价——以地质大学隧道为例[J].安全与环境工程,2006,13(2):44-47. 被引量:7
  • 5何锡兴,周红波,姚浩.上海某深基坑工程风险识别与模糊评估[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(B11):1912-1915. 被引量:66
  • 6CAO Xinying, LI Xiaodong, ZHU Yi, et al. Environmental impact assessment on industrialized house and traditional house construction[C]// Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Volume 1, Kansas, America, October 1 2, 2012. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012: 155-159.
  • 7HERTWICH E G, PEASE W S, KOSHLAND C P. Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1997, 196(1): 13-29.
  • 8HAUSCHILD M Z, POTTING J. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment — the EDIP- 2003 methodology . Guidelines from the Danish EPA [DB/OL]. [2004] . http://forskningsbasen.deff.dk/Share.external?sp=Sc572e916-f044-4056-ad02-879659bc088a&sp=Sdtu.
  • 9WEISS M, PATEL M, HEILMEIER H, et al. Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 50(3): 260-281.
  • 10YANG Jianxin(杨建新), XU Cheng(徐成),WANG Rusong(王如松). Methodology and application of life cycle assessment (产品生命周期评价方法及应用)[M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2002.

共引文献58

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部