期刊文献+

智商与情商哪个对学习更重要? 被引量:3

IQ or EQ:Which is More Important for Students’Learning?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究对860名中学生进行为期一年共三次的追踪研究,旨在考察学生的智商和情商对其语文、数学、英语三科学业成绩的预测作用。交叉滞后模型分析表明:(1)学生先前的智力水平(即智商)能够显著正向预测其三科学业成绩,也即智力水平高的学生,其三科学业成绩也越高;(2)学生的人格特质(即情商的重要指标),尤其是开放性人格也显著正向预测其学科成绩;(3)从长远来看,学生的智力与开放性人格存在交互作用,二者可以相互弥补彼此的不足,从而影响学生以后的学习成绩。可见,智商和情商对学生的学习都十分重要,教育在重视学生潜力开发和智力发展的同时,也应注重培养学生健全的人格。 This study of a sample of 860 Chinese secondary school students used Raven reasoning test and Big Five personality scale to investigate the longitudinal relationship between intelligence,personality and students’academic performance in three subjects(Chinese,Math,and English).This is a three-wave longitudinal study covering one school year.The cross-lagged panel model analyses indicated that:(1)students’previous intelligence level can significantly and positively predicted their academic performance in all three subjects.That is,students with high intelligence level tended to achieve higher academic performance in three subjects;(2)students’personality traits,especially openness,also significantly and positively predicted their academic performance in all three subjects;(3)in the long-term run,there is a compensatory interaction between students’intelligence and openness in the prediction of academic performance.In this regard,both intelligence and personality traits are very important for students’learning.Educators should not only pay attention to the development of students’potential and intelligence,but also to the cultivation of students’personality traits.
作者 张静 Zhang Jing(Department of Educational Psychology,Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第11期69-79,共11页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 全国教科规划项目国家青年项目“项目化学习中社会与情感能力的动态多维测评研究”(CEA210260)。
关键词 青少年 智力 大五人格 学业成绩 交叉滞后模型 adolescents intelligence Big Five personality traits academic performance cross-lagged panel model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 2Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 3Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 4Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 17:441-444.
  • 5Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and Care more rehable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29:907-920.
  • 6Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Baldini C, Rollnik J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO- FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:713-722.
  • 7Hrebickova M, Urbanek T, Cermak I, Szarota P, Fickova E, et al. The NEO five-factor inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In McCrae RR Allik R. The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:53-78.
  • 8McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 36:587-596.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10Parker WD, Stumpf H. A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 25:1005-1025.

共引文献174

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部