期刊文献+

重症监护室护士谵妄知识调查量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:2

Translation and reliability and validity of the development of a delirium knowledge test for intensive care nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的汉化重症监护室护士谵妄知识调查量表(DKT-ICN),并进行信效度检验。方法采用Brislin翻译模式,对量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适,形成汉化版DKT-ICN。2021年9—12月采用便利抽样法选取郑州大学第一附属医院的316名研究对象进行横断面调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版DKT-ICN量表水平的内容效度指数为0.98,各条目水平的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00,中文版DKT-ICN的Cronbachα系数为0.884,各维度的Cronbachα系数0.608~0.679,量表的重测信度为0.753,各维度的重测信度在0.880~0.978。结论中文版DKT-ICN具有良好的信效度,可作为测验ICU护士谵妄相关知识掌握情况的评价工具。 Objective This study aimed to translate the development of a delirium knowledge test for intensive care nurses(DKT-ICN)and test its reliability and validity.Methods The DKT-ICN was translated and adapted according to Chinese culture following the translation,back translation and culture adaptation of DKT-ICN using Brislin′s translation model.The Chinese version of DKT-ICN was tested among 316 nurses conveniently sampled in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September to December 2021,the reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated by cross-sectional survey method.Results The scale-content validity index was 0.98,and the item-content validity index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00,the Cronbach′sαfor the total scale was 0.884,and the Cronbach′sαfor five dimensions ranged from 0.608 to 0.679.The test-retest reliability was 0.753 for the overall scale,and 0.880-0.978 for each domain.Conclusion The Chinese version of DKT-ICN has acceptable reliability and validity.The DKT-ICN is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the knowledge level of ICU nurses in China.
作者 刘文慧 孔羽 梁素瑞 Liu Wenhui;Kong Yu;Liang Surui(ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;Nursing Department of Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University,Shenzhen 518133,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2022年第26期2062-2068,共7页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 谵妄 知识 护士 重症监护病房 问卷 信度 效度 Delirium Knowledge Nurses Intensive care units Questionnaire Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献99

  • 1郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,吴少敏,朱淑明.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211. 被引量:175
  • 2安友仲,邱海波,黄青青,康焰,管向东.中国重症加强治疗病房患者镇痛和镇静治疗指导意见(2006)[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1158-1166. 被引量:243
  • 3重症加强治疗病房病人镇痛和镇静治疗指南(2006)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(12):893-901. 被引量:215
  • 4戴海琦,张锋,陈雪枫.心理与教育测量(修订本)[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2007:59–65.
  • 5吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003..
  • 6陈孝平.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.681-683.
  • 7Gagliese L,Melzack R.Chronic pain in elderly people[J]. Pain, 1997,70( 1 ) :3-4.
  • 8Fink R. Pain assessment:the cornerstone to optional pain man- agement[J]. Proc(Bayl Univ Med Cent),2000,13(3):236-239.
  • 9Gentile DA,Woodhouse J,Lynch P. Reliability and validity of the global pain scale with chronic pain sufferers[J]. Pain Phy- sician, 2011,14 : 61-70.
  • 10Brislin RW.Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials[M]//Triandis HC,Berry JW.Handbook of crosseuhural psychology: methodology. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon,1980:389- 444.

共引文献440

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部