期刊文献+

形成性评价在汽车底盘构造与维修课程中的应用 被引量:3

Application of Formative Assessment in the Course of Automobile Chassis Construction and Maintenance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课程考核评价是课程建设与课堂教学的指挥棒,形成性评价对教育高质量发展与高素质人才培养起着指引作用。文章以学生为中心,结合学习通平台,在汽车底盘构造与维修课程中,以课程项目化设计、任务驱动式学习、混合式教学为基础,融入课程思政目标,将形成性评价融入教学环节,形成了形成性评价的应用方案。通过开展形成性评价,能够丰富线上课程资源并提高利用率,帮助学生形成良好的学习方法,教师优化教学策略,在课程教学中取得良好的效果,达到教学目标。 Curriculum assessment is the baton of curriculum construction and classroom teaching,and formative assessment plays a guiding role in the development of high-quality education and the cultivation of high-quality talents.This paper was student-centered, and combined with the learning pass platform.In the course of automobile chassis construction and maintenance, based on the project-based design, task driven learning, and hybrid teaching, the ideological and political goals of the course were added, and formative assessment was integrated into the teaching process, forming an application scheme of formative assessment.By carrying out formative assessment, we can enrich online curriculum resources and improve the utilization rate, help students form good learning methods and teachers optimize teaching strategies, achieve good results in curriculum teaching, and achieve teaching objectives.
作者 李伟 肖珊 LI Wei;XIAO Shan(Department of Automotive Engineering,Sichuan Vocational and Technical College of Communications,Chengdu 611130,China)
出处 《汽车实用技术》 2022年第22期155-158,共4页 Automobile Applied Technology
基金 四川交通职业技术学院教学专项“基于学习通平台的《汽车底盘构造与维修》课程形成性考核评价改革与实践”(2021-JG-06)。
关键词 汽车底盘构造与维修课程 学习通平台 形成性评价 The course of automobile chassis construction and maintenance Learning pass platform Formative assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1Genesee F & Upshur J A. Classroom-based evaluation in second language education[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 2Hamp-Lyons L & Condon W. Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory & research[M].Mount Waverly: Hampton Press, Inc , 2000.
  • 3Hein G & Price S. Active assessment for active science[M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1994.
  • 4National Council oF Teachers oF Mathematics. Assessment standards For school mathematics [M]. Reston,VA: NCTM, 1995.
  • 5National Research Council. Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards [M].Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. J M Atkin, P Black, J Coffey (eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Washington, DC: National Academy press, 2001.
  • 6Rassi j A. Rational for formative assessment component in new audiology certification standards. 1999.Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://professional, asha. org/academic/Rassi Formative Assess. cfm.
  • 7Sadler, D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems[J]. Instructional Science, 1989,18(2): 119--144.
  • 8Simpson M. Developing differentiation practices: Meeting the needs of teachers and pupils [J]. The Curricuium Journal, 1997, 8(1) : 85 -- 104.
  • 9Simpson M. Diagnostic and formative assessment in the Scottish classroom[A]. In T G K Bryce and W.M. Humes (eds.) Scottish Education[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
  • 10Stiggins R J. Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2002, 83(10) : 758--765.

共引文献442

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部