期刊文献+

从语言共同体到种族主义象征——近代“雅利安”观念在欧亚大陆的流传轨迹

From Linguistic Community to Racist Symbol——The Spreading Track of the “Aryan” Discourse in Modern Eurasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “雅利安人”作为纳粹种族主义理论的象征在近代世界历史中起到了非常负面的作用。然而“雅利安人”这一词语最早见于《阿维斯陀》《吠陀经》等古代典籍,是古代印度—伊朗人的自称,并无种族主义内涵。近代欧洲的知识分子赋予了“雅利安人”种族主义含义。从欧洲东方学衍生出来的历史比较语言学重新发现了古代“雅利安人”这一词语,并随之将其引入历史学与民族学的讨论之中。而从皮克泰、戈比诺到休斯顿·张伯伦等知识分子则不断将人种学与种族主义要素添加进对“雅利安人”的讨论中,并最终形成了希特勒的人种优越理论。“雅利安人”观念在欧洲的演变体现了近代欧洲知识界将来自“东方”的知识单向度化、片面化、狭隘化,并最终彻底嬗变为欧洲种族主义的一部分,与其本身面貌大相径庭。 The term"Aryan"has played a very negative role in modern world history as a symbol of Nazi racist doctrine.However,the term"Aryan"is first found in ancient texts such as the Avesta and the Vedas,and served as an self-identification for Indo-Iranians,had nothing to do with racist connotations.It was the intellectuals of modern Europe that really gave the term"Aryan"a racist connotation,as the historical comparative linguistics,which derived from European oriental studies,rediscovered the ancient term"Aryan"and subsequently introduced it into the debate of History and Ethnology.Intellectuals including Adolph Pictet,Arthur Gobineau and Houston Chamberlain continued to add ethnographic and racist elements to the discourse of"Aryan",culminating in Hitler’s theory of racial superiority.The evolution of the discourse of the"Aryan"in Europe reflects the unidirectional,one-sided,narrow-minded and ultimately radical transformation of knowledge from the East in modern European intellectual,which eventually completely became a series of knowledge of European racism,thus disfigured its reality.
作者 冀开运 杨田再杰 Ji Kaiyun;Yang Tian Zaijie
出处 《中东研究》 2022年第1期122-143,323,共23页 Middle East Studies
基金 2018年度国家社科基金国别史重大专项支持课题“伊朗多民族统一国家的构建与治理研究”(2018VJX085)阶段性成果。
关键词 雅利安人 历史比较语言学 种族主义 Aryan Historical Linguistics Racism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献64

  • 1朱高正.康德批判哲学的启蒙意义──谈文化主体意识的重建[J].哲学研究,1999(7):51-56. 被引量:13
  • 2周流溪.印欧语言起源新说[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(2):73-76. 被引量:4
  • 3William Jones, A Grammar of the Persian Language, 1771, Menston, Yorkshire: The Scolar Press, 1969.
  • 4The Mohammedan Law of Succession to the Property of Intestates, trans. William Jones, London: Dilly, 1792.
  • 5Anna Maria Jones, ed., The Works of William Jones. 13 vols., London: John Stockdale and John Walker, 1807, 3: 34-35.
  • 6Thomas Trautmann, Aryans and British India, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1997, p. 38.
  • 7Max Muller, "On the Relation of the Bengali to the Arian and Aboriginal Languages of India, " (1847).
  • 8Thomas Trautmann, Aryans and British India, p. 176.
  • 9Thomas Trautmann, Aryans and British India, pp. 174-175.
  • 10Thomas Trautmann, Aryans and British India, pp. 51-52.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部