关于董仲舒评价之评价

Comments on the Evaluations of Dong Zhongshu

回顾历史,学界对董仲舒的评价表现出明显的两极化,或极端地褒扬,或极端地贬斥。从整个学术史的角度来看,这两种评价虽然观点互相抵牾,但却均具有偏执、非理性即‚不成熟‛的共性。若‚成熟‛地讲,评价董仲舒应坚持‚人文性‛‚历史理性‛‚学术界限‛‚开放性‛四个原则,在此原则下对董仲舒的评价会更加公允。

Looking back on history,the evaluations of Dong Zhongshu in academic circles show obvious polarization,either extreme praise or extreme depreciation.From the perspective of the whole academic history,although these two evaluations have contradictory views,they both share the common characteristics of bigotry and irrationality,which are“immature”.The“mature”evaluations of Dong Zhongshu should adhere to the four principles of“humanity”,“historical rationality”,“academic boundary”and“openness”.Under these principles,the evaluations of Dong Zhongshu will be reasonable and fair.