期刊文献+

线下体验与供应链分销合同的相互作用

The Interaction between Offline Experience and Supply Chain Distribution Contracts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究针对日益流行的线下体验,考察了由单个制造商和单个电子零售商组成的二级供应链系统,运用消费者效用理论建立了需求函数。在EB和基准情形下,分别利用主从对策原理求得批发价合同与代理销售合同下的均衡解,比较分析出消费者效用最大化时满足制造商与电子零售商双赢的条件。通过情形比较发现:制造商在一定条件下可以实现EB情形下的利润更高,而电子零售商始终在基准情形下利润更高。进一步通过合同比较发现,代理销售合同始终优于批发价合同。因此,在代理销售合同下进行机制设计,能够实现电子零售商在开设线下体验店时与制造商共赢。 In view of the increasingly popular offline experience,a supply secondary chain system composed of a single manufacturer and a single e-tailer was considered,and the consumer utility theory was used to establish a demand function.In the EB and benchmark situations,the principle of master-slave countermeasures was used to obtain the equilibrium solution under the wholesale price contract and the agency selling contract,the conditions which can meet a win-win situation for the manufacturer and the electronic retailer when the consumer’s utility is maximized was obtained by comparison and analysis.The results show that the manufacturer can realize that the profit in EB case is greater than the profit in benchmark case under certain conditions under the wholesale price contract and the agency selling contract.However,the electronic retailer will not choose to open an offline experience store no matter what kind of contract is adopted.Furthermore,it was found that the agency selling contract is always better than the wholesale price contract either in EB case or in benchmark case.Therefore,design of a mechanism under the agency selling contract can meet the maximum utility of consumers and achieve a win-win situation for the manufacturer and the e-tailer.
作者 陈倩 刘森 CHEN Qian;LIU Sen(Business School,Yunnan University of Business Management,Kunming 650106;School of Logistics,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Kunming 650221)
出处 《科技促进发展》 2022年第4期504-513,共10页 Science & Technology for Development
基金 2018年国家自然科学基金地区项目(71862035):云计算技术影响供应链敏捷性的作用机理研究——基于IT治理机制的视角,负责人:刘森 2019年云南省科学技术厅云南省基础研究计划面上项目(2019FB085):云计算技术影响企业供应链能力的作用机理研究——基于信息技术二元性理论,负责人:刘森。
关键词 供应链管理 线下体验 消费者异质 代理销售 机制设计 supply chain management offline experience consumer heterogeneity agency selling mechanism design
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献68

  • 1汤卫君,梁樑,扶元广,杨锋.单个垄断厂商多产品质量差别歧视和最优质量定价策略分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(1):84-90. 被引量:13
  • 2王庆国,蔡淑琴,汤云飞.基于质量信息不对称度的消费者效用与企业利润研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(1):88-93. 被引量:32
  • 3Karmarkar U S,Pitbladdo R C. Quality. class,andcompetition[J]. Management Science, 1997,43(1):27-39.
  • 4Wang X H, Yang B Z. Mixed-strategy equilibria in aquality differentiation model[J], International Journalof Industrial Organization, 2001,19(1-2) : 213-226.
  • 5Economides N. Quality choice and vertical integration[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,1999, 17(6): 903-914.
  • 6Syam N B, Ruan R,Hess J D, et al. Customizedproducts: A competitive analysis [J]. MarketingScience,2005,24(4) : 569-584.
  • 7Liu Q,Serfes K. Imperfect price discrimination in avertical differentiation model [ J ]. InternationalJournal of Industrial Organization, 2005,23 ( 5-6 ):341-354.
  • 8Choudhary V,Ghose A,Mukhopadhyay T, et al.Personalized pricing and quality differentiation [J ].Management Science, 2005 , 51(7) : 1120-1130.
  • 9Bloch F,Manceau D. Persuasive advertising inHotelling's model of product differentiation [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization .1999, 17(4): 557-574.
  • 10Rhee B-D. Consumer heterogeneity and strategicquality decisions[J]. Management Science, 1996,42(2): 157-172.

共引文献199

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部