期刊文献+

线路焊缝区几何不平顺动力响应仿真分析

Simulation and Analysis of Dynamic Cesponse of Geometric Irregularity in Railway Welding Seam Zone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为分析列车在不同焊缝形状和波深下的车辆动力响应与轮轨接触状态,建立普速客车-有砟轨道垂向耦合动力学模型和焊缝不平顺模型。将焊缝按照几何形状分为倒V形、M形、V形和W形,分析4类焊缝在不同波深、速度等工况下的垂向动力响应。发现焊缝不平顺会引起轮轨垂向力、轴箱垂向振动加速度等参数在短时间内增幅达到30%左右,造成较大的轮轨冲击。焊缝波深越大,车速越快,车辆-轨道系统垂向动态响应越差,轮轨垂向力最大增加66.28%。根据焊缝安全限值的计算结果,发现W形焊缝安全限值最小,倒V形焊缝安全限值最大。建议优先打磨处理W形焊缝,再依次处理V形、M形焊缝,最后处理倒V形焊缝。 In order to analyze the vehicle dynamic response and the wheel-rail contact state of the train under different welding seam shapes and wave depths,a normal-speed passenger car-ballasted track vertical coupling dynamics model and a welding seam irregularity model are established.The welding seams are divided into inverted V-shaped,Mshaped,V-shaped and W-shaped according to their geometric shapes,and the vertical dynamic responses of the four types of welding seams under different wave depths,speeds and other conditions are analyzed.It is found that the irregu⁃larity of the welding seam will cause the parameters such as the vertical force of the wheel-rail and the vertical vibration acceleration of the axle box to increase about 30%in a short time,resulting in a large wheel-rail impact.The larger the welding seam wave depth,the faster the vehicle speed,the worse the vertical dynamic response of the vehicle-track sys⁃tem,and the maximum increase in the vertical force of the wheel and rail by 66.28%.According to the calculation for the safety limit of the welding seam,it can be found that the safety limit of the W-shaped welding seam is the smallest,and the safety limit of the inverted V-shaped welding seam is the largest.It is recommended to give priority to grinding the W-shaped welding seam,subsequent grinding V-shaped,M-shaped,and finally grinding inverted V-shaped welds.
作者 胡伟豪 林凤涛 HU Weihao;LIN Fengtao
出处 《铁道技术监督》 2022年第10期49-54,共6页 Railway Quality Control
关键词 钢轨焊缝 轮轨动力学 轮轨冲击 安全限值 钢轨打磨 Rail Welding Seam Wheel-rail Dynamics Wheel-rail Impact Safety Limit Rail Grinding
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1陈建兵,李杰.结构随机响应概率密度演化分析的数论选点法[J].力学学报,2006,38(1):134-140. 被引量:40
  • 2阿部则次 福井义弘.レへル寿命延伸のための溶接部凹凸管理[J].铁道总研报告,1994,8(11):17-22.
  • 3石田诚 阿部则次.レへル头顶面凹凸と溶接部曲げ疲劳の关系[J].铁道总研报告,1990,4(7):8-15.
  • 4石田诚 河野昭子.轨道支持刚性のレへル溶接部曲げ疲劳こ与える影响[J].铁道总研报告,1998,12(3):49-50.
  • 5GB5599-85,铁道车辆动力学性能评定和试验鉴定规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1985.
  • 6倪振华.振动力学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1988.480-489.
  • 7Frank N. New rail could solve rolling contact fatigue[J ]. International Railway Journal &. Rapid TransitReview,2003,43(5): 49-50.
  • 8Steenbergen M J M M, Esveld C. Rail weld geometryand assessment concepts [J]. Journal of Rail RapidTransit, 2006, 220(F3): 257-271.
  • 9Steenbergen M J M Esveld C. Relation betweenthe geometry of rail welds and the dynamic wheel—rail response; numerical simulations for measuredwelds [J]. Journal of Rail Rapid Transit, 2006,220(F4): 409-423.
  • 10Steenbergen M J M M. Modelling of wheels and raildiscontinuities in dynamic wheel—rail contact analysis[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2006,44(10) : 763-787.

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部