期刊文献+

祛魅与赋魅:新技术革命的启蒙批判 被引量:1

Disenchantment and Enchantment:Enlightenment and Criticism of New Technological Revolution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以信息技术、生物工程等技术为代表的新技术革命深刻地改变了人的生产生活状况,推动了现代化进程,但是光芒的背后仍需对其现代性予以正视。新技术革命背后隐藏的普遍先验理性根据和工具理性逻辑,不但使神话得以复归,幻想以知识的外衣重现于世,也使得人发生了异化。在祛魅与赋魅的交织下是科技文明的悲鸣,而二者的张力则在于以人文理性的呐喊,指向人的自由和解放。 The new technological revolution represented by information technology,biological engineering and other technologies has profoundly changed people’s production and living conditions and promoted the modernization process.However,behind the light,we still need to face up to its modernity.The universal transcendental rational basis and instrumental rational logic hidden behind the new technological revolution not only make the myth return,the fantasy reappear in the world under the cloak of knowledge,but also make people alienated.Under the interweave of disenchantment and enchantment is the lament of science and technology civilization,and the tension of the two lies in the cry of humanity rationality,pointing to human freedom and liberation.
作者 庙翰赢 Miao Hanying(School of Marxism,Inner Mongolia University,Hohhot 010030)
出处 《鹿城学刊》 2022年第3期93-96,共4页 Journal of Lucheng
关键词 新技术革命 启蒙辩证法 启蒙理性 new technology revolution enlightenment dialectics enlightenment rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p xiv.
  • 2Jurgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1995, p.118.
  • 3霍耐特.《权力的批判--批判社会理论反思的几个阶段》,上海:上海人民出版社,2012年,第49-52页和第95页.
  • 4Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic oJ Enlightenment." Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stantbrd: Stantord University Press, 2002, p.22, p.23.
  • 5Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p,65.
  • 6Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.24.
  • 7Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p27.
  • 8Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund J1hcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p29,p.26.
  • 9Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.29,p.65.
  • 10Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo, Dialectic of Enlightenment." Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.71, p.67, p.70.

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部