中国特色行政法典的编纂研究——以公共行政整体型特征为视角

Research on the Codification of Administrative Code with Chinese Characteristics:From the Perspective of the Holistic Characteristics of Public Administration

如何建构和编纂具有中国特色的行政法典?如何贡献行政法典的中国方案?这些都是行政法典编纂必须直面的问题。相比其他部门法典,行政法典最具国别特色,因为各国对公共行政有着不同的实践解读。与西方以个人主义为中心、强调外部行政活动的个体化行政相比,我国公共行政遵循的是整体主义的进路,具有明显的整体型行政特征,着眼于整体行政目标,倚重系统的组织和运行。改革开放后,我国既坚守了国家治理及公共行政的整体性特质,又强调个体的自由和权利,形塑出更具包容性的整体型行政模式。为有效回应公共行政的法治诉求,我国行政法典编纂应以整体型行政为重心,同时重视个人权利保护,以行政系统的组织和运行为框架,建构一套符合系统规律的客观行政法体系,实现整体利益和个人权利并重的双重价值目标。

How to construct and codify the administrative code with“Chinese characteristics”?How to provide a“Chinese solution”for the Administrative Code?These are the issues that must be faced directly by the codification of administrative code.Compared with other sectors of law,the administrative code has the most prominent nation-specific characteristics,as different countries have different interpretations on the way public administration is implemented.Compared with the“individualized administration”in western countries,which focuses on individualism and emphasizes external administrative activities,China’s public administration follows a holistic approach and has distinct“holistic administration”characteristics.It focuses on the overall administrative goal and relies on the organization and operation of the system.After the reform and opening up,China has not only maintained the holistic nature of national governance and public administration,but also emphasized the freedom and rights of individuals,shaping a more inclusive“holistic administration”model.In order to effectively respond to the demands of the rule of law in public administration,the codification of China’s administrative code should focus on“holistic administration”,while attaching importance to the protection of individual rights,and construct an objective administrative law system that conforms to the systematic laws within the framework of the organization and operation of the administrative system,so as to realize the dual value goal of attaching equal importance to the collective interests and individual rights.