智库研究人员评价模型构建的质化研究

Qualitative Research on the Construction of Evaluation Models for Think Tank Researchers

建设中国特色新型智库离不开评价的支撑。智库研究人员评价模型立足智库研究的供给者和需求者之间的互动关系,利用对多名政府部门人员、智库研究人员的访谈资料构建而成。该模型包含能力导向和成果导向的两种评价方式。在实际工作中,智库对研究人员评价的指标以成果导向为主,且政府智库、高校智库和社会智库对成果的要求呈现出多样化的特征。政府智库和高校智库均高度重视成果被高级别领导批示和采纳的情况,但在成果形式上政府智库更重视委托研究,高校智库更重视自主性较强的政策研究和论著发表,而企业智库更重视带来“流量”的媒体传播。不同类型智库可按需选择适切指标开展智库研究人员评价。

New types of think tank with Chseinese characteristics cannot be separated from supporting evaluation.Our research is founded on the interaction between the supply side and the demand side in think tank research.Using interviews with six government officials and twenty-six think tank researchers,we created an evaluation model containing two types of evaluation:competence-oriented and result-oriented.In actual practice,think tanks tend to adopt resultoriented indicators when evaluating researchers,but the result requirements for think tanks in government,universities and society show diverse characteristics.Both government and university think tanks attach great importance to the approval and adoption of having their results by high-level leaders,but in terms of the form taken by results,government think tanks attach more importance to commissioned research;university think tanks attach more importance to autonomous policy research and publication;and corporate think tanks value media coverage that brings“traffic.”Different types of think tanks can choose appropriate indicators to evaluate their research staff according to their needs.