期刊文献+

考虑策略型消费者失望厌恶下零售商的渠道选择与退货策略研究

Channel Selection and Return Policy Considering Strategic Consumers Disappointment Aversion
原文传递
导出
摘要 考虑策略型消费者对线上产品估值的不确定导致其失望厌恶时,线上渠道退货策略对消费者购买渠道偏好、购买时机选择及零售商渠道开设、定价订货决策的影响。以最大化利润为目标,同时考虑线上渠道是否退货,分别构建了线下渠道、线上渠道无退货、线上渠道退货策略下消费者的效用函数以及零售商的利润模型。研究表明:零售商的开设渠道偏好与消费者的购买渠道偏好并不总是一致的,当产品匹配率较低且旅行成本较低时,零售商与消费者均偏好线下渠道,反之零售商与消费者的渠道偏好不一致;另外,当消费者偏好线上渠道时,在无退货策略下,消费者对产品估值的不确定产生失望厌恶降低了零售商的最优定价、订货量与最优利润,而退货策略有利于消除估值不确定与失望厌恶对零售商利润的不利影响,并且退货策略有利于吸引消费者到线上渠道购买,因此零售商开设线上渠道时总会同时提供退货策略,从而为零售商的退货策略选择提供决策支持。 Considering that strategic consumers were uncertain about the valuation of online products and disappointment aversion,the impact of whether online channel provided return policy on consumers’purchasing channel preferences,purchase timing,retailer channel establishment,pricing and ordering decisions,was studied.With the goal of maximizing profits,considering whether online channel was returned,the consumer’s utility function and the retailer’s profit model under the offline channel,online channel with and without returned,were respectively constructed.Research shows that retailer’s preference for establishing channel is not always the same as consumer’s preference for purchasing channel.When product matching rate is low and travel costs are low,retailers and consumers prefer offline channel,otherwise,the channel preferences of retailers and consumers are inconsistent.In addition,when consumers prefer online channel to purchase,consumers’uncertainty and disappointment in product valuation reduce the retailers’optimal pricing and ordering under the non-return policy.The return policy helps to eliminate the negative impact of uncertainty and disappointment aversion on the profit of retailers,and the return policy is conducive to attracting consumers to buy through online channel.Therefore,when retailers establish online channel,the return policy will always be provided at the same time,so as to provide decision support for the retailer’s choice of return policy.
作者 陈飔佳 官振中 CHEN Sijia;GUAN Zhenzhong(School of Economics and Management,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610031,China)
出处 《工业工程与管理》 北大核心 2022年第5期69-78,共10页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572154) 服务科学与创新四川省重点实验室资助(KL2104)。
关键词 策略型消费者 产品估值不确定 失望厌恶 退货策略 strategic consumers product value uncertainty disappointment aversion return policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献73

  • 1Kie J., S. M. Shugan. Electronic Tickets, Smart Cards, Online repayments: When and How to Advance Sell. Marketing Sci- race, 2001, 20(3): 219-243.
  • 2Shugan S. M., J. Xie. Advance Selling for Services. CaliforniaManagement Review, 2004, 46(3): 37-54.
  • 3Zhao X., K. E. Stecke. Pre-orders for New To-be-Released Products Considering Consumer Loss Aversion. Production and Operations Management, 2010, 19(2): 198-215.
  • 4Yu M., Kapuscinski R., H. S. fect of Capacity and Customer Ahn. Advance Selling-the Ef- Behavior, Working Paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2007.
  • 5Prasad A., K. E. Stecke, X. Zhao. Advance Selling by a News- vendor Retailer, Production and Operations Management, 2011, 20(1): 129-142.
  • 6Davis S., E. Gerstner, M. Hagerty. Money Back Guarantees in Retailing: Matching Products to Consumer Tastes. Journal of Retailing, 1995, 71(1): 7-22.
  • 7Kumar N., V. D. R. Guide, Jr., L. Van Wassenhove. Managing Product Returns at Hewlett Packard. Teaching Case 05/2002- 4940, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France, 2002.
  • 8Swinney R.. Selling to Strategic Consumers When Product Value is Uncertain: The Value of Matching Supply and De- mand. Management Science, 2011, 57(10): 1737-1751.
  • 9Su X.. Consumer Returns Policies and Supply Chain Perfor- mance, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2009, 11(4): 595-612.
  • 10Earnest L., A. G. Uribarri. Costco Halts Liberal Electronics Return Policy. Los Angeles Times (February 28) C1. 2007.

共引文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部