摘要
《翼教丛编》是晚清力辟康学的名著,初刊时无人署名,序文宣称“采获、叙次,悉出同人”,声明为集体纂辑,但第一个翻刻者黄协埙径指苏舆为编者,从此广为流传;叶德辉则在民国年间屡以撰刊《翼教丛编》相标榜,成为学界新说。然而,稽核相关史料,“苏舆编刻”说不足凭信,叶德辉的矜夸自相矛盾。进一步探查《翼教丛编》的纂辑“同人”,发现王先谦、叶德辉、张祖同等五人最核心,“捍乱”领袖王先谦则是主事人,不过他有意潜隐,嫁名于门人苏舆。通过探究《翼教丛编》编者问题,可以还原戊戌湖南反变法中一些久被湮没的重要细节。
Yi Jiao Cong Bian,as a strong counterblast to Kang Youwei’s claims,was originally compiled and published with its editors unnamed. Despite a reference to composite editorship in the preface,the work was in the first instance attributed to Su Yu,which soon gained popularity.Later Ye Dehui was in general believed to be the actual compiler,owing to the pretense repeatedly made by Ye to his individual involvement in the compilation. However,both of the editorial identifications attract scepticism. Based on a thorough examination of the source,it can be inferred that there were once five core figures in the collective compilation,of whom Wang Xianqian was the leading one. Furthermore,Wang intentionally merged into the background under the pseudonym Su Yu. This study reveals some hitherto-unknown details concerning the backlash against the 1898 Reform in Hunan.
出处
《社会科学战线》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第9期120-135,282,F0002,共18页
Social Science Front
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(11BZX045)。
