期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁中透明度原则的适用与发展 被引量:1

The Principle of Transparency in International Investment Arbitration: Its Application and Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资仲裁中涉及的东道国管理措施往往与公共利益密切相关,如环境保护、公共健康、金融安全等方面,因此也涉及公众知情权与仲裁程序的透明度问题。提高国际投资仲裁的透明度,以防止同类案件裁决的不一致性或不公正性,对于国际投资条约仲裁走出合法性危机具有重要意义。本文从投资仲裁中透明度原则的背景意义、含义内容与法律依据、对投资仲裁程序的适用、第三方资助的信息披露等方面,论述投资仲裁中透明度原则的适用现状与发展进程,其中特别关注投资仲裁程序的公众参与、仲裁员独立公正披露义务、《透明度规则》适用于国际投资仲裁程序的问题。 The host country regulatory measures involved in international investment arbitration are often closely related to such public interests as environmental protection,public health,and financial security,and thus also involve the public s right to know and the transparency of arbitration procedures.Improving the transparency of international investment arbitration to prevent the inconsistency or injustice in the handling of similar cases is of great significance for international investment treaty arbitration to rise above the legality crisis it faces.In light of this,this paper is intended to discuss the current situation and development process of the application of the transparency principle in investment arbitration in terms of its background,significance,and legal basis,its application to investment arbitration procedures,the information disclosure of third-party funding,etc.Special attention is paid to the public participation in investment arbitration proceedings,the arbitrators obligation to disclose information independently and impartially,and the application of The Rules on Transparency to international investment arbitration proceedings.
作者 孙南申 Sun Nanshen
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《法治现代化研究》 2022年第5期68-83,共16页 Law and Modernization
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“国际投资争端解决程序的保障机制研究”的资助(17BFX145)。
关键词 国际投资仲裁 透明度原则 公众知情权 信息披露义务 法庭之友 international investment arbitration principle of transparency public s right to know obligation to disclose information amici curiae
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献125

  • 1徐崇利.经济一体化与当代国际经济法的发展[J].法律科学,2002,20(5):116-127. 被引量:21
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:37
  • 3Gu Weixia, Confidentiality Revisited: Blessing or Curse in International Commercial Arbitration? American Review of International Arbitration, 2004, vol, 15, p. 608.
  • 4Alan Redfern & Martin Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004, p. 27.
  • 51998年伦敦国际仲裁院仲裁规则第30条第1款.
  • 6Alexis C. Brown, Presumption Meets Reality: An Exploration of the Confidentiality Obligation in International Commercial Arbitration, American University International Law Review, 2001, vol, 16, p. 972.
  • 71998年国际商会仲裁规则第21条第3款及第20条第7款.
  • 81976年联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则第25条第4款和第32条第5款.
  • 91996年世界知识产权组织仲裁中心仲裁规则第73条、第74条、第75条、第76条.
  • 101998年伦敦国际仲裁院仲裁规则第19条、第30条.

共引文献251

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部