期刊文献+

基于行人保护开发的aPLI和柔性腿对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative Analysis of the aPLI and Flex-PLI Based on Pedestrian Protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 腿型冲击器是行人保护腿碰性能开发的基础。本文介绍了aPLI腿型冲击器的结构特点,并以四款车型为例对aPLI腿型和Flex-PLI腿型进行碰撞分析。从单车型腿碰结果和数据统计两方面,分析两腿型碰撞结果的差异及原因。在此基础上,对腿碰结果较差的三款车型进行优化分析。结果表明,相比Flex-PLI腿型,aPLI腿型仿真结果与真实事故更加接近,对行人保护腿碰性能开发要求更高,在相同指标下,对车型下支撑、防撞梁吸能空间和上支撑要求更加严格。 Legform impactor is the basis for performance development of pedestrian protection.In this study,we introduced the structure characteristics of the aPLI,and the FE simulation of the aPLI and Flex-PLI was carried out with four car models.The differences of results and reasons were analyzed,through FE simulation results of a single car and data statistics.Then structures of three models with poor results were optimized and analyzed.The result shows,compared with the Flex-PLI,simulation results of the aPLI are closer to real accidents,which requires higher for pedestrian protection.Under the same index,the requirements for the lower support,energy absorption space and upper support are more strict.
作者 侯延军 韩鹏鹏 卜家贺 刘宏宇 Hou YanJun;Han PengPeng;Bu Jiahe;Liu HongYu
出处 《时代汽车》 2022年第23期151-153,共3页 Auto Time
关键词 行人保护 aPLI腿型 柔性腿型 优化设计 Pedestrian protection aPLI Flex-PLI Optimal design
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a Decade of Action [R]. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013.
  • 2Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety Phase 2 (IG PS2). History of Development of the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor, GTR9-C-04 [Rl. Bonn: Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP), 2011.
  • 3ALDMAN B, LUNDELL B, THORNGREN L. Physical Simulation of Human Leg-Bumper Impacts [C]// 1979 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Goeteborg, Sweden, 1979: 232-242.
  • 4NYQUIST G W, CHENG R, EL-BOHY A A R, et al. Tibia Bending: Strength and Response [J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 1985 (29) : 99-112.
  • 5YANG J K. Review of Injury Biomechanics in Car- Pedestrian Collisions [J]. International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 2005(1): 100-117.
  • 6YANG J K, KAJZER J, CAVALLERO C, et al. Computer Simulation of Shearing and Bending Response of the Knee Joint to a Lateral Impact [J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 1995(39) : 251-264.
  • 7ZANDER O. Open Questions and Proposals for ACL PCL and MCL Injury Thresholds, TEG-078 [R]. Bergisch: Flex-PLI Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG), 2008.
  • 8European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC). Improved Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Afforded by Passenger Cars, GTR9-4-05 [R]. Brussels: EEVC Working Group 17 Pedestrian Safety, 1998.
  • 9MATSUI Y, ISHIKAWA H, SASAKI A, et al. Impact Response and Biofidelity of Pedestrian Legform Impactors [C] // Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts, Barcelona, International Research Council on the Biokinetics of Impacts (IRCOBI), 1999: 343-354.
  • 10TAKAHASHI Y, KIKUCHI Y, OKAMOTO M, et al. Biofidelity Evaluation for the Knee and Leg of the Polar Pedestrian Dummy [C]//The 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Washington DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Admini- stration, 2005.

共引文献12

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部