期刊文献+

在线商品的选择过载效应及调节定向作用研究 被引量:2

Online choice overload effect and the moderating role of consumer regulatory focus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在线商品浏览购买转化率是平台商最为看重的指标.为此,在线商家非常重视规划选择商品、优化选择体验、促进选择决策、防止选择过载效应.在线商品选择过载效应是市场营销与电子商务领域重要的研究问题.研究一通过行为学实验与仿真方法,研究了选择集特征导致选择过载效应变化的规律;研究二通过行为学实验,研究了消费者调节定向在其中的作用.研究发现:1)在线商品选择集的理想程度与选项数目改变所导致的选择过载效应变化规律.在线选择集增多选项时,会在非理想选择集中产生选择过载效应,造成选择难度变大、选择放弃意愿上升、选择放弃概率提高;相对理想选择集的选择过载效应不明显;2)消费者调节定向在在线选择过载效应发生过程中具有调节效应.将选择过载效应的研究拓展到线上可以指导在线商家针对商品集的特征与消费者特性制定营销策略,降低选择过载效应,提高浏览购买转化率. Owing to the importance of purchase conversion, online retailers put much emphasis on planning merchandizing to enhance consumer experience, promote consumer choice, and avoid choice overload. Online choice overload is thus an essential topic in the research areas of marketing and e-commerce. Using a behavioral experiment and a simulation, the paper firstly examines how choice overload changes with the desirability and size of online choice sets. Secondly, an additional experiment is conducted to investigate the moderating role of consumer regulatory focus. Our findings suggest that increasing the size of undesirable online choice sets results in significantly greater choice difficulty and choice deferral while no such effect exists in desirable online choice sets. In addition, consumer regulatory focus moderates online choice overload effect. Our paper extends the choice overload literature by shifting its focus beyond offline shopping to online scenarios, and thus provides managerial implications for online retailers designing marketing strategies to reduce choice overload and enhance purchase conversion.
作者 王风华 郑宇杰 万岩 潘煜 WANG Feng-hua;ZHENG Yu-jie;WAN Yan;PAN Yu(School of Business and Management,Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620,China;School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China)
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第9期15-31,共17页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71772124,71942003,71671115) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(17YJA630097) 上海市特聘教授(东方学者跟踪计划)资助项目(GZ2019003) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(20161140019)。
关键词 在线消费 选择过载效应 调节定向 在线选择集 实验室实验研究 online consumption choice overload effect regulatory focus online choice set laboratory experiment research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献130

  • 1朱丽叶.调节聚焦理论及其在营销研究中的应用[J].经济经纬,2009,26(5):120-123. 被引量:5
  • 2沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 3史金艳,李凯,郁培丽.考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1196-1199. 被引量:5
  • 4Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 5Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113-123.
  • 6Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 7Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 8Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 9Carrnon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.
  • 10Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47-58.

共引文献157

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部