摘要
“自洗钱”妨害司法与破坏金融管理秩序的可罚性本质受不可罚的事后行为说“遮蔽”,亟待重视。期待可能性说因应刑事政策而变,为“自洗钱”入刑提供了理论根据。“不法占有型”与“非法经营型”两种上游犯罪不法侵害内涵并不完全相同。上游犯罪本犯“自洗钱”,属数行为的成立实质的数罪,应当数罪并罚;对“不法占有型”,在量刑时应当根据禁止重复评价原则扣减洗钱罪的量刑基准。属于一行为的,成立想象竞合犯,应当择一重罪重处。本犯参与“他洗钱”的,如同“自洗钱”一样具有期待可能性。
The punishable nature of“self-money laundering”obstructing justice and undermining the order of financial management is“covered”by the theory of the unpublished behavior after the fact,which urgently needs attention.The theory of expected possibility changes according to the criminal policy,which provides a theoretical basis for the punishment of“self-money laundering”.The connotation of illegal infringement of the two upstream crimes of“illegal possession type”and“illegal operation type”is not exactly the same.The criminal who successively committed the upstream crime and“self-money laundering”would be punished together.For“illegal possession type”,the sentencing benchmark of money laundering crime should be deducted according to the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation.If it belongs to one act,the imaginative joinder of offenses should be given a heavier punishment.If the criminal who had committed the upstream crime participates in“other money laundering”,it has the same expected possibility as“self-money laundering”.
作者
陈山
Chenshan(the Law School of Sichuan Normal University)
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期89-102,共14页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
2021年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般项目“自洗钱入刑的教义学重塑——以期待可能性为视角”(GJ2021C25)阶段性成果。
关键词
自洗钱
刑法教义学
期待可能性
妨害司法犯罪
Self-money Laundering
Doctrine of Criminal Law
Expected Possibility
Crime of Obstruction of Justice