虚不可谓之理,理则虚尔——论朱熹对“太虚”概念的诠释

Taixu can not be called Tianli,but only Tianli is Taixu-On Zhu Xi's Interpretation of the Concept of“Taixu”

从形上之道的视角看待张载的天道论,是朱子对其诠释的哲学开端,在诠释活动中反复出现“理”与“气”的纠葛,说明朱子对张载的超越性洞见有所不满。正因如此,他必须以“天理”释“太虚”,借以厘清在气化论的格局下,突出张载“清虚一大”的本体维度,同时批判其“夹气作一处”的理论缺陷,由此展开并形成理气论诠释的新范式。

Zhuzi’s philosophy begins as Viewing Zhang Zai's theory of heaven from the perspective of metaphysical Tao and interpreting of it.The entanglement between“Li”and“Qi”repeatedly appears in the interpretation activities,which shows that Zhu Zi is dissatisfied with Zhang Zai's transcendental insight.For this reason,he must interpret“Taixu”with“Tianli”,so as to clarify the noumenon dimension of Zhang Zai's“clearing and emptiness”under the pattern of the theory of gasification,and at the same time criticize his theoretical defect of“intercalating Qi into one place”,so as to develop into a new paradigm for the interpretation of the theory of Qi.