期刊文献+

GRACE评分及PARIS评分对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者远期主要心血管不良事件的预测价值 被引量:6

Values of GRACE score and PARIS score to the prediction of long-term adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(non-ST elevation myocardial infarction,NSTEMI)患者全球急性冠状动脉事件登记(global registry of acute coronary events,GRACE)评分及支架术后抗血小板药物停药模式(patterns of non-adherence to antiplatelet regimens in stented patients,PARIS)评分情况,探讨其对NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生主要心血管不良事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACEs)的预测价值。方法698例NSTEMI患者根据出院后3年内是否发生MACEs分为预后不良组176例和预后良好组522例,比较2组年龄、血肌酐水平及入院时GRACE评分、PARIS评分等;采用多因素Cox回归分析NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生MACEs的影响因素;绘制ROC曲线,评估入院时GRACE评分、PARIS评分及血肌酐预测NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生MACEs的效能。结果预后不良组糖尿病(46.02%)、贫血(30.68%)、出院时三联抗血小板治疗(13.64%)比率,年龄[66.00(58.00,76.00)岁],血肌酐[85.00(67.95,114.19)μmol/L]、空腹血糖[7.58(5.79,10.34)mmol/L]水平及入院时GRACE评分[130.00(102.75,158.00)分]、PARIS评分[5.00(3.00,7.00)分]均高于预后良好组[31.03%、13.60%、2.11%、61.00(51.00,70.00)岁、72.00(61.00,89.14)μmol/L、6.96(5.41,9.44)mmol/L、114.00(94.00,136.00)分、4.00(2.00,5.00)分](P<0.05),男性、吸烟史比率,体质量指数、血小板计数、左室射血分数及血红蛋白、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、白蛋白水平均低于预后良好组(P<0.05)。出院时三联抗血小板治疗(OR=1.634,95%CI:1.128~1.919,P=0.017)、血肌酐(OR=1.004,95%CI:1.001~1.012,P=0.021)、入院时PARIS评分(OR=1.322,95%CI:1.199~1.357,P<0.001)是NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生MACEs的影响因素。入院时GRACE评分、PARIS评分、血肌酐分别以128.50分、5.50分、76.27μmol/L为最佳截断值,预测NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生MACEs的AUC分别为0.669(95%CI:0.622~0.716,P<0.001)、0.756(95%CI:0.712~0.800,P<0.001)、0.646(95%CI:0.597~0.695,P<0.001),灵敏度分别为62.3%、60.2%、62.4%,特异度分别为68.4%、79.5%、59.1%。结论出院后3年内发生MACEs的NSTEMI患者入院时GRACE评分和PARIS评分均明显增高;与GRACE评分相比,PARIS评分对NSTEMI患者出院后3年内发生MACEs的预测价值较高。 Objective To observe the scores of global registry of acute coronary events(GRACE)and patterns of non-adherence to antiplatelet regimens in stented patients(PARIS)in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI),and to investigate their values to the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs)in 3years after discharge.Methods According to the occurrence of MACEs in 3years after discharge,698patients with NSTEMI were divided into poor prognosis group(n=176)and good prognosis group(n=522).The age,serum creatinine level,GRACE score and PARIS score on admission were compared between two groups.Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of MACEs in patients with NSTEMI in 3years after discharge.ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the efficiencies of GRACE score,PARIS score and serum creatinine on predicting MACEs in patients with NSTEMI in 3years after discharge.Results The percentages of patients with diabetes and anemia,receiving triple antiplatelet therapy on discharge,age,serum creatinine level,fasting plasma glucose level,GRACE score and PARIS score were higher in poor prognosis group[46.02%,30.68%,13.64%,66.00(58.00,76.00)years,85.00(67.95,114.19)μmol/L,7.58(5.79,10.34)mmol/L,130.00(102.75,158.00),5.00(3.00,7.00)]than those in good prognosis group[31.03%,13.60%,2.11%,61.00(51.00,70.00)years,72.00(61.00,89.14)μmol/L,6.96(5.41,9.44)mmol/L,114.00(94.00,136.00),4.00(2.00,5.00)](P<0.05),while the male ratio,smoking history rate,body mass index,platelet count,left ventricular ejection fraction,hemoglobin,low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and albumin were lower in poor prognosis group than those in good prognosis group(P<0.05).The triple antiplatelet therapy on discharge(OR=1.634,95%CI:1.128-1.919,P=0.017),serum creatinine level(OR=1.004,95%CI:1.001-1.012,P=0.021)and PARIS score(OR=1.322,95%CI:1.199-1.357,P<0.001)were the influencing factors of MACEs in patients with NSTEMI in 3years after discharge.When the optimal cut-off values of GRACE score,PARIS score and serum creatinine were 128.50,5.50and 76.27μmol/L,the AUCs for predicting MACEs were 0.669(95%CI:0.622-0.716,P<0.001),0.756(95%CI:0.712-0.800,P<0.001)and 0.646(95%CI:0.597-0.695,P<0.001),the sensitivities were 62.3%,60.2%and 62.4%,and the specificities were 68.4%,79.5%and 59.1%,respectively.Conclusion NSTEMI patients with MACE in 3years after discharge have significantly high GRACE and PARIS scores on admission,and PARIS score has a higher predictive value than GRACE score.
作者 祖丽护玛·色依提 努尔艾合麦提·加马力 高晓明 单雪峰 Zulihuma SEYITI;Nueraihemaiti JAMALI;GAO Xiao-ming;SHAN Xue-feng(Department of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830011,China;Clinical Medicine Institute,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830011,China)
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2022年第10期989-992,共4页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基金 国家自然科学基金(U1903212)。
关键词 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死 GRACE评分 PARIS评分 主要心血管不良事件 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction global registry of acute coronary events score patterns of non-adherence to antiplatelet regimens in stented patients score major adverse cardiovascular events
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1徐向进,潘长玉,田慧,陆菊明.糖代谢异常老年人群死亡率的分析[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2003,19(4):267-270. 被引量:36
  • 2中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5224
  • 3Dotevall A, Rosengren A, Bartnik M, etal. Sex-related aspects on abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Eur Heart J,2007,28(3):310-315.
  • 4Lerman A, Sopko G. Women and cardiovascular heart disease: clinical implications from the Women Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: are we smarter[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47(3 SuppI) :S59- 69.
  • 5Bartnik M, Ryden L, Malmberg K. Oral glucose tolerance tesl is needed for appropriate classification of glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Diabetes and the Heart[J]. Heart, 2007, 93 (1) :72-77.
  • 6Festa A, D'Agostino R Jr, Howard G, et al. Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS)[J]. Circulation,2000,102(1) :42-47.
  • 7SinghM, GershBJ, McClellandRL, etal. Predictive factors for ischemic target vessel revascularization in the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial [J]. J AmCollCardiol,2005,45(2):198- 203.
  • 8Norhammar A, Malmberg K, Diderholm E. Diabetes melIitus: the major risk factor in unstable coronary artery disease even after consideration of the extent of coronary artery disease and benefits of revascularization[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004, 43 (4) : 585-591.
  • 9田磊,米树华,戴文龙,王楠晔,陶红.冠心病合并糖调节受损或2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉特点及介入术后的观察[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2009,17(10):743-745. 被引量:11
  • 10陈文,王又平,王相智.2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者冠状动脉病变特点[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2010,24(11):1070-1071. 被引量:23

共引文献769

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部