期刊文献+

“四个评价”视域下“双高院校”师资管理改革反思及改革策略--以深圳职业技术学院为例

Reflections and Countermeasures on Reform of Teachers’Management in High-level Vocational Schools from Perspective of“Four Evaluations”—Take Shenzhen Polytechnic as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于适配理论,重点围绕“结果评价、过程评价、增值评价、综合评价(四个评价)”,按照“分类适配、应用解析、问题反思、实践探索”步骤,以深圳职业技术学院为例,对师资管理工作中的“职称评聘、效绩考核、薪酬优化、教师培训”进行了分类研究,认为当前职称评审存在重形式轻内容、重数量轻质量、缺乏增值评价和赋能评价的管理智慧、大多是单一性管理及评价等问题,提出了相对应的改革策略--完善职称评聘管理策略、改进结果评价管理,优化绩效考核管理策略、强化过程评价管理,构建适配薪酬体系策略、探索增值评价管理,分类开展教师培训策略、健全综合评价管理,以期探索出符合新时代“双高院校”师资发展需求的新路径。 Based on the adaptation theory,this paper focuses on“Four Evaluations”(result evaluation,process evaluation,value-added evaluation and comprehensive evaluation).According to the steps of“classification adaptation,application analysis,problem reflection and practice exploration”,it takes Shenzhen Polytechnic as an example and conducts a classified study on teacher management,concerning“professional title evaluation,performance evaluation,salary optimization and teacher training”.The professional title assessment currently focuses more on form rather than on content and cares more about quantity instead of quality.It lacks management wisdom such as value-added evaluation and empowering evaluation.Besides,it does not have a comprehensive management and evaluation system.To solve these problems,this paper puts forward corresponding reform strategies.Measures include reforming management strategies of professional title assessment,improving result evaluation management,optimizing performance evaluation management,strengthening a process evaluation management,adopting a flexible salary system,exploring value-added evaluation management,training teachers according to different requirements and developing a comprehensive evaluation management.A new approach is hence explored to meet the needs of the teachers’development in a new era.
作者 杨开亮 YANG Kailiang(Teacher’s Development Center,Shenzhen Polytechnic,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518055,China)
出处 《深圳职业技术学院学报》 CAS 2022年第6期42-47,共6页 Journal of Shenzhen Polytechnic
基金 深圳教育科学规划2020年度重点课题“深圳城产教融合视角下高职教师发展中心培训供给侧改革研究”(zdzz20001) 广东省质量工程项目2021年度教育教学改革重点课题“基于双高计划建设的深圳高职金课教师培训供给研究”(7021310012)。
关键词 新时代教育评价 双高院校 四个评价 师资管理 改革策略 educational evaluation in a new era high-level vocational schools “Four Evaluations” teacher management reform strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献92

  • 1欧阳波仪,易启明,汪炎珍,杨明鄂,李治国.高质量发展视域下高职教师教学创新团队建设研究[J].中国职业技术教育,2020,0(5):88-92. 被引量:74
  • 2张民选.绩效指标体系为何盛行欧美澳[J].高等教育研究,1996,17(3):86-91. 被引量:28
  • 3刘芳.高等教育政策的创新过程:支持联盟框架的透视[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(3):7-11. 被引量:6
  • 4雅斯贝尔斯 邹进译.什么是教育[M].北京:三联书店出版社,1991..
  • 5(美)罗索.论教育[M].靳建国译.北京:东方出版社,1990,190.
  • 6George D. Kuh,C. Robert Pace,Nick Vesper. The Development of Process Indicators to Estimate Student Gains Associated with Good Practices in Undergraduate Education[J] 1997,Research in Higher Education(4):435~454
  • 7Rivkin S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement [ J l- Econometrica, 2005, 73 (2) : 417 -458.
  • 8University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assess- ment Center. Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement [ R]. Knoxville, TN, 1996.
  • 9Sanders W. L., S. P. Wright, and S. P. Horn. Teach- er and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation [ J ]. Journal of Per- sonnel Evaluation in Education, 1997, 11 (1) : 57 -67.
  • 10Jason Millman. Grading teachers, grading schools : Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure [M]. Cor- win Press Ine, 1997.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部