中国医学科学院药物研究所学生宿舍居住满意度调查分析

Investigation and Analysis of the Students’ Residence Satisfaction in Institute of Materia Medica,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

目的:分析中国医学科学院药物研究所学生宿舍情况及居住满意度,为学校后勤工作提供参考。方法:采用线上问卷调查的方式,以随机抽样为调查方法,选取问卷开放期间(2022年6月27日起至2022年7月1日止)内中国医学科学院药物研究所住宿生为研究对象,分析住宿生情况及居住满意度差异情况。结果:本研究回收有效问卷234份,其中按住宿区域划分,校内住宿生154人参与答题,校外住宿生80人参与答题;按学历划分,硕士研究生129人参与答题,博士研究生105人参与答题。博士研究生对人均居住面积的满意度低于硕士研究生(P<0.05);校外住宿生对人均居住面积满意度低于校内住宿生,宿舍区周边环境满意度低于校内住宿生,而对维修及相关后勤服务的满意度高于校内住宿生(P<0.05);影响居住满意度因素排名第一的为宿舍公共设施;超过50%以上校内、校外住宿生均对住宿收费持反对态度。学历因素、宿舍所在地因素与收缴住宿费看法态度间无差异(P>0.05)。结论:高校应在宿舍人均面积上对硕士、博士研究生进行区分;综合社会化租赁宿舍与自建宿舍的优势,提高宿舍硬件设施条件,凸显高校在探索住宿费专项经费的收缴、使用工作的潜在空间。

Objective: To analyze the dormitory situation and residential satisfaction of students in Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, so as to provide reference for the logistics work of the institute. Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted and random sampling was used to select the resident students in the Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences during the questionnaire period(from June 27, 2022 to July 1, 2022) as the research group. The situation of resident students and the differences in residential satisfaction were analyzed. Results: A total of 234 valid questionnaires were collected in this study, including 154 students living on campus and 80 students living off campus. According to educational background, 129 of master’s degree students, and 105 of doctoral students participated in the answer. The degree of satisfaction of per capita living area of doctoral students was lower than that of master students(P < 0.05). Students living off campus had lower satisfaction with per capita living area than students living on campus, lower satisfaction with the surrounding environment of dormitory area than students living on campus, and higher satisfaction with maintenance and related logistics services than students living on campus(P<0.05). The first factor influencing residential satisfaction was dormitory public facility. More than 50% of on-campus and off-campus students held opposing attitude to the accommodation expenses. There was no significant difference in the factors of education background, location of dormitory and the attitudes towards paying accommodation expenses(P>0.05). Conclusion: Institute should distinguish master’s and doctoral students in per capita dormitory area. The advantages of social rental dormitory and self-built dormitory should be integrated, and the hardware facilities of dormitory should be improved, which highlights the potential space for the institute to explore the collection and use of special funds for accommodation expenses.