期刊文献+

初产经产和是否患妊娠期糖尿病产妇的新生儿出生体质量、血糖、脐动脉血气对比观察分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis of birth weight,blood glucose,umbilical arterial blood gas of newborns in nulliparous or multiparous mothers with or without gestational diabetes mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比观察初产经产和是否患妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)产妇的新生儿出生体质量、血糖、脐动脉血气。方法单胎妊娠产妇及其新生儿共87对,根据生产史不同分为初产妇组和经产妇组,根据是否诊断为GDM分为GDM组和无GDM组。胎儿出生后称重,根据胎龄别出生体质量将新生儿分为小于胎龄儿(SGA)、适于胎龄儿(AGA)、大于胎龄儿(LGA),对比分析各组新生儿出生体质量。在产后未开奶前检测新生儿末梢血糖,对比分析各组新生儿低血糖检出率。胎儿娩出后取脐动脉血,采用血气分析仪进行脐动脉血气分析,记录pH、血氧分压(PO_(2))、二氧化碳分压(PCO_(2))、实际碳酸氢盐(AB)、标准碳酸氢盐(SB)、全血剩余碱[BE(B)]、细胞外液剩余碱[BE(ecf)]数值,对比分析各组新生儿脐动脉血气指标。将新生儿胎龄别出生体质量、低血糖检出率和脐动脉血气作为结局指标,采用二分类Logistic回归法探讨GDM对新生儿胎龄别出生体质量、低血糖检出率的影响,采用广义线性回归法分析初产经产对脐动脉血气指标的影响。结果初产妇组SGA、AGA、LGA、低血糖检出率与经产妇组相比,P均>0.05。与无GDM组新生儿相比,GDM组新生儿中SGA占比降低、LGA占比升高、低血糖检出率升高(P均<0.05)。初产妇组新生儿脐动脉血pH、AB、SB、BE(B)、BE(ecf)值均低于经产妇组(P均<0.05)。GDM组、无GDM组新生儿脐动脉血pH、PCO_(2)、PO_(2)、AB、SB、BE(B)、BE(ecf)值差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。经产是新生儿脐动脉血pH、AB、SB、BE(B)值的保护性因素。未发现GDM对新生儿出生体质量、低血糖检出率产生影响。结论经产是新生儿脐动脉血pH、AB、SB、BE(B)值的保护性因素,但不影响新生儿出生体质量、血糖。GDM对新生儿出生体质量、血糖和脐动脉血气均不产生影响。 Objective To compare the birth weight,blood glucose,and umbilical arterial blood gas of newborns in nulliparous or multiparous mothers with or without gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM).Methods Information from 87 pairs of singleton pregnancies and newborns were collected.Pregnancies were grouped according to their production history(primipara and multipara groups)and the OGTT(GDM and non-GDM groups).According to the birth weight for gestational age,newborns were divided into small for gestational age(SGA),appropriate for gestational age(AGA),and large for gestational age(LGA).We compared the birth weight and the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in different groups before suckling.We collected the umbilical arterial blood,and we recorded and compared the potential of hydrogen(pH),partial pressure of oxygen(PO_(2)),partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PCO_(2)),actual bicarbonate(AB),standard bicarbonate(SB),blood base excess[BE(B)],and base excess extracellular fluid[BE(ecf)]values.We analyzed the effect of GDM on gestational age specific birth weight and neonatal hypoglycemia by binary Logistic regression models,and the generalized linear regression model was used to analyze the impact of parity on the umbilical arterial blood gas value.Results The prevalence of SGA,AGA,LGA,and hypoglycemia had no difference between nulliparous and multiparous mothers(all P>0.05).Compared with the non-GDM group,the proportion of SGA in the GDM group decreased,the proportion of LGA and the hypoglycemia detection rate increased(all P<0.05).The pH,AB,SB,BE(B),and BE(ecf)values of umbilical arterial blood were significantly lower in nulliparous mothers than in multiparous mothers(all P<0.05),while there was no significant difference between the GDM group and non-GDM group for these values(all P>0.05).Multiparity was the protective factor of umbilical arterial blood pH,AB,SB,BE(B).GDM did not affect birth weight and the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia.Conclusions Multiparity is a protective factor for umbilical arterial blood pH,AB,SB,and BE(B)values,but does not affect the birth weight and neonatal blood glucose.GDM has no effect on birth weight,neonatal blood glucose,and umbilical arterial blood gas.
作者 林梦文 王慧 孙谊然 王莉 白文琳 LIN Mengwen;WANG Hui;SUN Yiran;WANG Li;BAI Wenlin(School of Public Health,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001,China)
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2022年第33期18-22,共5页 Shandong Medical Journal
基金 山西省青年科技研究基金项目(201901D211335) 山西省自然科学基金项目(202103021224247)。
关键词 初产妇 经产妇 妊娠期糖尿病 出生体质量 新生儿血糖 脐动脉血气 primipara multiparity gestational diabetes mellitus birth weight neonatal blood glucose umbilical arterial blood gas
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献88

  • 1杨慧霞,周世梅.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇围产儿预后的临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(3):139-142. 被引量:98
  • 2中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病诊断标准[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(8):584-584. 被引量:1307
  • 3陈自励,何锐智,彭倩,郭可瑜,张玉琼,袁惠华.脐动脉血气在新生儿窒息诊断中的意义和价值[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(1):24-27. 被引量:59
  • 4陈自励,何锐智,彭倩,郭可瑜,张玉琼,袁惠华.新生儿窒息诊断标准改进的临床研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(3):167-172. 被引量:73
  • 5ACOG committee opinion. Use and abuse of the Apgarscore. Number 174-July 1996 (replaces No. 49,November1986 ). Committee on Obstetric Practice and AmericanAcademy of Pediatrics: Committee on Fetus and Newborn.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int JGynaecol Obstet, 1996, 54 : 303-305.
  • 6Rehan VK? Phibbs RH. Delivery room management//MacDonald MG,Seshia MMK> Mullett MD,et al. Avery'sneonatalogy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott WilliamsWilkins,2005:304-326.
  • 7Blickstein 1,Green T. Umbilical cord blood gases. ClinPerinatol, 2007,34:451-459.
  • 8ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG CommitteeOpinion No. 348,November 2006 : Umbilical cord blood gasand acid-base analysis. Obstet Gynecol,2006, 108: 1319-1322.
  • 9Thorp JA,Rushing RS. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,1999,26 : 695-709.
  • 10White CR, Doherty DA, Henderson JJ,et al. Benefits ofintroducing universal umbilical cord blood gas and lactateanalysis into an obstetric unit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2010, 50:318-328.

共引文献205

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部