期刊文献+

初中物理教材课后习题与课程标准的一致性分析——以人教版九年级全册物理为例 被引量:2

Consistency Analysis of Junior High School Physics Textbook After-school Exercises and Curriculum Standards——Take the PEP Physics Textbook of the 9th Grade as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于韦伯模式和课程实施调查(Survey of the enacted curriculum,SEC)模式,对人教版初中9年级全册物理教材的课后习题与《义务教育物理课程标准(2011版)》的一致性进行了探讨.韦伯一致性分析结果显示:课程标准和教材课后习题在知识种类和知识分布平衡性上具有较好的一致性;在知识深度和知识广度上各个主题的一致性不等,吻合性较差.SEC—致性分析结果显示:物理课程标准与教材课后习题的一致性基本达到了可接受水平,但还需要通过提高一致性程度较低的2级主题“能量”的一致性,从而提高全册的一致性程度. Based on the Webb model and the survey of the curriculum(SEC) model,the consistency between the after-school exercises of the full-volume physics textbooks for the ninth grade of junior high school and the Compulsory Education Physics Curriculum Standards(2011 Edition) was discussed. The results of Webb’s consistency analysis show that the curriculum standards and after-school exercises of textbooks have good consistency in the balance of knowledge types and knowledge distribution. The consistency of each topic in knowledge depth and knowledge breadth is unequal,and the consistency is poor. The SEC’s consistency analysis results show that the consistency between the physics curriculum standard and the after-school exercises in the textbook has basically reached an acceptable level,but it is also necessary to improve the consistency of the secondary theme“ energy”, so as to improve the consistency of the fullvolume textbook.
作者 宋思杰 侯皇敏 谌宝菊 刘子豪 阳露 SONG Si-jie;HOU Huang-min;CHEN Bao-ju;LIU Zi-hao;YANG Lu(School of Physics,Electricity and Intelligent Manufacturing,Huaihua University,Huaihua,Hunan 418008)
出处 《怀化学院学报》 2022年第5期122-128,共7页 Journal of Huaihua University
基金 湖南省大学生创新训练项目“物理教材课后习题与课程标准的一致性研究”(S202210548043) 怀化学院2021年教学改革研究项目“专业实践课教学质量保障体系构建及实施” 怀化学院教学改革项目“校企合作双体制下实验室整合与管理”。
关键词 韦伯模式 SEC模式 一致性 课程标准 课后习题 Webb model SEC model consistency curriculum standards after-school exercises
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).450.
  • 2Blank, R. (2002). Models for Alignment Analysis and As- sistance to States. Council of Chief State School Officers Summary Document. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Ot/icers.2.
  • 3Webb, N.L. (1997). Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Council of Chief State School Oteers and National Insti- tute for Science Education Research Monograph No. 6). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for E- ducation Researeh.l-38./Webb, N. L. (2002). Alignment Study in Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies of State Standards and Assessments for Four States. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. 1-66.
  • 4http://wat.wceruw.org/2011-09-10.
  • 5Porter, A. C. (2002, October). Measuring the Content of In- struction: Uses in Research and Practice. Educational Re- searcher, 31(7): 3-14.
  • 6Porter, A., Smithson, J., Blank, R., & Zeidner, T. (2007/This Issue). Alignment as a Teacher Variable. Applied Measure- ment in Education, 20:27-51.
  • 7Lauren B. Resnick, Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery and Jennifer L. Vranek. Benchmarking and Alignment of Stan- dards and Testing. Educational Assessment, 9(1&2): 1 -27.
  • 8Subkoviak, M. J. (1988). A Practitioner's Guide to Compu- tation and Interpretation of Reliability Indices for Mastery Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25:47-55.
  • 9Norman,L.Webb. Alignment of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States [ R]. Washington, DC :Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.23.
  • 10S. Sireei,F. Robin,K. Meara,H. Rogers,H. Swaninathan. An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework [A]. N. Raju,J. Pelligrino,M. Bertenthal,K. Mitchell,L. Jones (Eds.). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP [C]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press,2000.74-100.

共引文献230

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部