期刊文献+

我国药物经济学成本-效果阈值测算方法的选择与数据获取方法研究 被引量:1

Research on the Selection of Cost-effectiveness Threshold Calculation Methods and Data Acquisition Methods of Pharmacoeconomics in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为我国药物经济学成本-效果阈值测算方法的选择和数据获取方法提供借鉴经验,以期我国在医保准入中设定合适的阈值参考范围,将真正具有经济性的药物纳入医保目录。方法:通过搜集整理现有成本-效果阈值测算方法的优劣势,结合国内外医保基金预算的灵活程度、数据获取的途径、类型和测算方法的选择,试图寻找适合我国的阈值测算方法和数据获取方法。结果:我国的医保基金预算的灵活度不高且具有医保控费的压力,适宜选择机会成本法,但该方法数据获取难度较大,为提高该方法测算结果的可靠性,英国还通过ICD-10代码对疾病进行分类获取数据,在当前数据获取难度较大的情况下,有操作性较强的意愿支付法或人均国内生产总值(Gross Domestic Product,GDP)法可供选择。结论:我国适宜选择机会成本法,在当前数据获取难度较大的情况下,建议选择意愿支付法或人均GDP法测得阈值作为参考。 Objective:To provide references for the selection of cost-effectiveness threshold calculation methods and data acquisition methods for pharmacoeconomics in China,so as to set an appropriate threshold reference range in medical insurance access and to include truly economical drugs in the medical insurance catalog.Methods:By collecting and sorting out the advantages and disadvantages of the existing costeffectiveness threshold calculation methods,combining with the flexibility of domestic and foreign medical insurance fund budgets,it is tried to find ways and types of data acuisitin,the choice of calculation methods,a threshold calculation method and data acquisition method suitable for your country.Results:Medical insurance fund budget in our country is not flexible and has the pressure of medical insurance cost control.It is advisable to choose the opportunity cost method,although it is difficult to obtain data.In order to improve the credibility of the calculation results of this method,the UK also classifies diseases to obtain data through ICD-10 code,in the current situation where data acquisition is difficult,willingness to pay method or per capita GDP method with strong operability could be selected.Conclusion:It is appropriate to choose the opportunity cost method in our country.In the current situation where data acquisition is difficult,it is recommended to choose the threshold measured by the willingness to pay method or the per capita GDP method as a reference.
作者 龚小玲 邵蓉 颜建周 Gong Xiaoling;Shao Rong;Yan Jianzhou(Research Institute of Drug Regulatory Sciences,China Pharmaceutical University/Key Laboratory of Drug Regulatory Innovation and Evaluation,State Drug Administration,Nanjing 211198,China)
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2022年第11期1215-1221,共7页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
基金 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(编号2020SJA-0074)。
关键词 成本-效果阈值 测算方法 测算数据 药物经济学 医保准入 cost-effectiveness threshold calculation method calculated data pharmacoeconomics access to medical insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献62

  • 1刘柏,赵振全,汪玲丽,刘周楠.卫生经济成本效果分析的前沿评价方法研究[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(6):75-76. 被引量:13
  • 2Rocchi A. The Role of Economic Evidence in Canadian Oncology Reimbursement Decision making: To Lambda and Beyond [J]. Value in Health, 2007, 11 (4): 771-783.
  • 3Hirth RA. Willingness to pay for a quality adjusted life year: in search of a standard [J].Med Deeis Making, 2000, 20 (3) : 332-342.
  • 4Braithwaite RS. What does the value of modern medicine say about the $ 50, 000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule? [J].Med Care, 2008, 46 (4): 349-356.
  • 5Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg. Zinnige en duurzame zorg. Zoetermeer [ R/OL] . [ 2011- 03 -20 ] .http: // www. rvz. net/data/download/advies _ Zinnige _ zorg. pdf.
  • 6Drummond M, Brown R, Fendrick AM, et. al. Use of phar macoeconomics informatio-report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care decision making [J]. Value in Health, 2003, 6 (4) : 407-416.
  • 7LA Sanchea Applied pharmameconomics: evaluation and use of pharmaceconomic data from the literature [J].. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1999, 56 (16): 1630-1638.
  • 8Raymond H, Dan C, Tessa TTE. Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for national-level priority-setting in the health sector [J]. Cost Effectiveness and ResourceAllocation, 2003, 1 (1): 8- 10.
  • 9Yen-Huei Tam. Current practice of using 1CER threshold in Asia: Taiwan [R/OL] . [2011-03-20]. http: //www. taspor. org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/2 _ how high-is-high, pdf.
  • 10Nancy D, David P. Does NICE have a cost effctiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis [J]. Health Economics, 2004, 13:437 -452.

共引文献137

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部